Results 11 to 20 of about 257 (98)
Cilfit en Schumacker: tijd voor nieuwe prejudiciële vragen aan het Hof van Justitie? [PDF]
NLFiscaal Wetenschappelijk, 2023 Nationale rechters en het HvJ zijn belast met de handhaving van het EU-recht. Bestaat onduidelijkheid hoe een bepaling van EU-recht moet worden uitgelegd, dan heeft de nationale rechter de mogelijkheid - en soms de verplichting – de vraag voor te leggen aan het HvJ.
Ros, Erik; id_orcid
core +3 more sources
On 19 February 2024, the European Court of Human Rights decided not to answer the Estonian Supreme Court’s request for an advisory opinion on the basis of Protocol 16 (P16). For the first time, it dismissed a request because it did not concern a question of principle concerning the interpretation and application of ECHR rights.
Krommendijk, Jasper
openaire +3 more sources
Rivedere CILFIT? Riflessioni giuscomparatistiche sulle conclusioni dell’avvocato generale Bobek nella causa Consorzio Italian management [PDF]
, 2021 In questo saggio si cercherà di contestualizzare e analizzare in maniera critica le conclusioni dell’avvocato generale Bobek al caso Consorzio Italian management, prestando particolare attenzione alle questioni che lo hanno indotto a suggerire alla Corte di giustizia dell’Unione europea un parziale superamento della nota giurisprudenza CILFIT.
Leonardo Pierdominici +1 more
openaire +2 more sources
, 2019 European Central Bank (ECB) Legal Research Programm (LRP), « The interpretative autonomy of the European Court of Justice and the margin of interpretation of national courts : a systematic reading of the Cilfit judgment » Proposal, Junior Scholar Submission 15 february 2019 Answer : 5 avril 2019-07-14 Status ...
Torres Rodríguez, Oscar
openaire +2 more sources
Si può “migliorare” CILFIT? Sulla sentenza Consorzio Italian Management [PDF]
, 2022 Da lungo tempo la dottrina si interroga sulla possibilità, se non di rinnegare, almeno di migliorare il dictum della sentenza CILFIT. Come è noto, nella sentenza, la CGUE ha definito le condizioni in cui non “scatta” l’obbligo di rinvio da parte del ...
Daniele, L
core
, 2021 The Consorzio Italian Management, Catania Multiservizi SpA v Rete Ferroviaria Italiana SpA (hereinafter, ‘Consorzio’) judgment has rightly attracted significant academic attention.
Gentile, Giulia +1 more
core +1 more source
From the duty to refer to the duty to state reasons : the past, present and future of the preliminary reference procedure [PDF]
, 2023 Special Issue on 'CJEU'Published online: 19 December 2023Although national courts of last instance are subject to a duty to refer under Article 267, paragraph 3, TFEU, the Court of Justice has significantly qualified that duty since Cilfit, thereby ...
MILLET, François-Xavier
core +2 more sources
Hof van Justitite van de Europese Unie te Luxemburg 6 oktober 2021 (Nr. C-561/19):BNB 2022/48
, 2022 Zaak Consorzio Italian Management. Cilfit-criteria.
Wattel, P.J.
core +1 more source
Review of European, Comparative &International Environmental Law, Volume 33, Issue 2, Page 265-275, July 2024.Abstract In an action for annulment against the European Union (EU) Emissions Trading Directive, both the EU General Court and the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) found the claim to be inadmissible because the applicants did not satisfy the infamous Plaumann criteria.
Michael Kalis, Anna‐Lena Priebe
wiley +1 more source
JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 62, Issue 2, Page 468-486, March 2024.Abstract This article explores how national judges' reasoning in the preliminary ruling procedure varies depending on the prescriptive clarity of European Union (EU) legal frameworks. Drawing on the logic of appropriateness and the logic of expected consequences, this article formulates hypotheses regarding judges' motivational patterns.
Karin Leijon
wiley +1 more source