Results 61 to 70 of about 383 (97)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Essential Cases: EU Law, 2018
Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Srl CILFIT and Lanificio di Gavardo SpA v Ministry of Health (Case 283/81), EU:C:1982:335, [1982] ECR ...
Noreen O'Meara
exaly +2 more sources
Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Srl CILFIT and Lanificio di Gavardo SpA v Ministry of Health (Case 283/81), EU:C:1982:335, [1982] ECR ...
Noreen O'Meara
exaly +2 more sources
European Taxation, 2019
In the context of a longstanding dispute over the tax treatment of dividends in France (the “précompte mobilier” dispute), the ECJ ruled, for the first time, that a Member State had failed to fulfil its obligations under EU law because its Supreme Court ...
F. Sicard
semanticscholar +2 more sources
In the context of a longstanding dispute over the tax treatment of dividends in France (the “précompte mobilier” dispute), the ECJ ruled, for the first time, that a Member State had failed to fulfil its obligations under EU law because its Supreme Court ...
F. Sicard
semanticscholar +2 more sources
EuGH, Überprüfung der CILFIT-Kriterien zum Umfang der Vorlagepflicht zum EuGH
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Insolvenzrecht, 2022semanticscholar +2 more sources
Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Srl CILFIT and Lanificio di Gavardo SpA v Ministry of Health (Case 283/81), EU:C:1982:335, [1982] ECR 3415, 6 October 1982. The document also included supporting commentary from author Noreen O’Meara.
Noreen O'Meara
openaire +2 more sources
2019
Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Srl CILFIT and Lanificio di Gavardo SpA v Ministry of Health (Case 283/81), EU:C:1982:335, [1982] ECR 3415, 6 October 1982.
exaly +2 more sources
Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Srl CILFIT and Lanificio di Gavardo SpA v Ministry of Health (Case 283/81), EU:C:1982:335, [1982] ECR 3415, 6 October 1982.
exaly +2 more sources
Der Acte Clair in der deutschen Rechtsprechung zum Europäischen Zivilprozessrecht
, 2021Knapp 40 Jahre nachdem der EuGH mit der Rechtssache CILFIT die Acte Clair-Doktrin in das Europarecht eingeführt hat, untersucht die Arbeit zum Europäischen Zivilprozessrecht die Vorlagepraxis und -bereitschaft der deutschen Gerichte.
semanticscholar +1 more source
The concept of fairness in the GDPR: a linguistic and contextual interpretation
FAT*, 2020There is a growing attention on the notion of fairness in the GDPR in the European legal literature. However, the principle of fairness in the Data Protection framework is still ambiguous and uncertain, as computer science literature and interpretative ...
Gianclaudio Malgieri
semanticscholar +1 more source
Österreichische Rechtsprechung zum Unionsprivatrecht
Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union, 2019L’arrêt CILFIT a souvent été considéré comme une stratégie de la CJCE. Il semble donner plus de moyens aux tribunaux nationaux, mais les conditions d’application de la doctrine sont difficiles, voire impossible, à satisfaire et assurent la position de la
W. Faber
semanticscholar +1 more source
Revista Española de Derecho Europeo
La obligación de los órganos judiciales de última instancia de motivar su decisión de no plantear una cuestión prejudicial al Tribunal de Justicia es un elemento fundamental para garantizar la eficacia del mecanismo de remisión prejudicial.
María José García Valdecasas
semanticscholar +1 more source
La obligación de los órganos judiciales de última instancia de motivar su decisión de no plantear una cuestión prejudicial al Tribunal de Justicia es un elemento fundamental para garantizar la eficacia del mecanismo de remisión prejudicial.
María José García Valdecasas
semanticscholar +1 more source
Verkorte motivering bij de niet-verwijzing van prejudiciële vraag door een hoogste nationale rechter
Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees rechtOp 24 maart 2026 oordeelde het Hof van Justitie in de zaak Remling dat artikel 267 VWEU voor de hoogste rechter geen ruimte laat om de zaak af te doen met een verkorte motivering als een partij een vraag heeft opgeworpen over de uitlegging of ...
M. Verhoeven, R. Widdershoven
semanticscholar +1 more source

