Results 11 to 20 of about 250 (54)

Rivedere CILFIT? Riflessioni giuscomparatistiche sulle conclusioni dell’avvocato generale Bobek nella causa Consorzio Italian management [PDF]

open access: yes, 2021
In questo saggio si cercherà di contestualizzare e analizzare in maniera critica le conclusioni dell’avvocato generale Bobek al caso Consorzio Italian management, prestando particolare attenzione alle questioni che lo hanno indotto a suggerire alla ...
Giuseppe Martinico   +1 more
core   +1 more source

Si può “migliorare” CILFIT? Sulla sentenza Consorzio Italian Management [PDF]

open access: yes, 2022
Da lungo tempo la dottrina si interroga sulla possibilità, se non di rinnegare, almeno di migliorare il dictum della sentenza CILFIT. Come è noto, nella sentenza, la CGUE ha definito le condizioni in cui non “scatta” l’obbligo di rinvio da parte del ...
Daniele, L
core   +1 more source

Beoordeling van eventuele verplichting om prejudiciële vragen te stellen [PDF]

open access: yes
Het Hof van Justitie EU (grote kamer) bevestigt in de zaak Kubera de CILFIT-doctrine nog eens. De hoogste nationale rechter moet het Hof van Justitie vragen stellen over de uitlegging van het Unierecht wanneer deze niet volstrekt duidelijk ...
de Wilde, Maarten
core   +8 more sources

L'obbligo (flessibile) di rinvio pregiudiziale e i possibili fattori di un suo irrigidimento. Riflessioni in margine alla sentenza Association France Nature Environnement

open access: yesEuropean Papers, 2017
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2017 2(1), 383-391 | European Forum Insight of 29 March 2017 | (Table of Contents) I. La questione al vaglio della Corte di giustizia. - II.
Federico Pani
doaj   +1 more source

CILFIT ‘Motionless Titan’ Has Moved, albeit Softly and with Circumspection: Consorzio Italian Management II [PDF]

open access: yes, 2022
The unwritten exceptions to the duty to refer, and most notably the so-called ‘acte clair doctrine’ forged in the well-known CILFIT case, have been the subject of much doctrinal attention and severe criticisms. Confronted with a preliminary ruling on the
Lorenzo Cecchetti
core  

Multilingual Law and Judicial Interpretation in the EU

open access: yesCroatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 2009
The purpose of this article is to assess how multilingualism affects judicial interpretation of EU law. In the EU, the European Court of Justice is in the position of having the final say on what EU norms mean.
Tamara Ćapeta
doaj   +1 more source

A Teleological Interpretation of the Definition of DeepFakes in the EU Artificial Intelligence Act—A Purpose‐Based Approach to Potential Problems With the Word “Existing”

open access: yesPolicy &Internet, Volume 17, Issue 1, March 2025.
ABSTRACT The EU Artificial Intelligence Act is the world's first attempt to holistically regulate artificial intelligence. It presents an extensive, multi‐faceted definition of deepfakes, and introduces specific safeguards against their misuses. These guardrails have the potential to become a global role model.
Mateusz Łabuz
wiley   +1 more source

The impact of EU expansion on the Preliminary Rulings Procedure [PDF]

open access: yes, 2008
In CILFIT (case 283/81), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) endorsed the use of the acte clair doctrine – the notion that national courts of “last resort” may decide to refrain from seeking a preliminary ruling under Article 234 (3) EC.
Storey, Tony
core  

The right to climate protection and the essentially comparable protection of fundamental rights: Applying Solange in European climate change litigation?

open access: yesReview of European, Comparative &International Environmental Law, Volume 33, Issue 2, Page 265-275, July 2024.
Abstract In an action for annulment against the European Union (EU) Emissions Trading Directive, both the EU General Court and the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) found the claim to be inadmissible because the applicants did not satisfy the infamous Plaumann criteria.
Michael Kalis, Anna‐Lena Priebe
wiley   +1 more source

A Matter of Prescriptive Clarity? Analysing How Swedish Judges' Motives for Action Vary in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure

open access: yesJCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 62, Issue 2, Page 468-486, March 2024.
Abstract This article explores how national judges' reasoning in the preliminary ruling procedure varies depending on the prescriptive clarity of European Union (EU) legal frameworks. Drawing on the logic of appropriateness and the logic of expected consequences, this article formulates hypotheses regarding judges' motivational patterns.
Karin Leijon
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy