Results 211 to 220 of about 2,984 (245)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Synthese, 2020
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +1 more source
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +1 more source
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2022
Philosophers of well-being have tended to adopt a foundationalist approach to the question of theory and measurement, according to which theories are conceptually prior to measures. By contrast, social scientists have tended to adopt operationalist commitments, according to which they develop and refine well-being measures independently of any ...
openaire +1 more source
Philosophers of well-being have tended to adopt a foundationalist approach to the question of theory and measurement, according to which theories are conceptually prior to measures. By contrast, social scientists have tended to adopt operationalist commitments, according to which they develop and refine well-being measures independently of any ...
openaire +1 more source
1993
Abstract In this chapter, I consider coherentism taken generally (rather than this or that particular variety of coherentism), and argue that it does not afford the resources for a satisfactory account of warrant. We can better understand coherentism, I think, by contrasting it with foundationalism; I accordingly begin with an ...
openaire +1 more source
Abstract In this chapter, I consider coherentism taken generally (rather than this or that particular variety of coherentism), and argue that it does not afford the resources for a satisfactory account of warrant. We can better understand coherentism, I think, by contrasting it with foundationalism; I accordingly begin with an ...
openaire +1 more source
2006
AbstractThis chapter explains moral coherentism as the view that some moral beliefs are justified by virtue of cohering with a system of belief that is coherent in the sense that it is consistent, connected, and comprehensive. Second-order beliefs about reliability are introduced to handle standard objections to coherentism. It concludes that coherence
openaire +1 more source
AbstractThis chapter explains moral coherentism as the view that some moral beliefs are justified by virtue of cohering with a system of belief that is coherent in the sense that it is consistent, connected, and comprehensive. Second-order beliefs about reliability are introduced to handle standard objections to coherentism. It concludes that coherence
openaire +1 more source
Foundationalism and Coherentism Reconsidered
Erkenntnis, 1998Etude du debat sur le fondationnalisme et le coherentisme, le naturalisme et l'anti-naturalisme, opposant M. Schlick et O. Neurath, puis W. V. Quine et D. Davidson. Examinant la defense de Quine developpee par R. Gibson contre Davidson, et examinant la fonction explicative de l'empathie recemment determinee par Quine, l'A.
openaire +2 more sources
1993
Abstract In this chapter, I explain and critically examine Laurence BonJour's version of coherentism, as presented in his The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Speaking roughly, BonJour holds that an empirical belief has warrant only if it is an element in a system of beliefs that is coherent in the long run.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract In this chapter, I explain and critically examine Laurence BonJour's version of coherentism, as presented in his The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Speaking roughly, BonJour holds that an empirical belief has warrant only if it is an element in a system of beliefs that is coherent in the long run.
openaire +1 more source
1989
In The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, Laurence BonJour defends a coherence theory of justification as part of a standard analysis of knowledge as justified true belief. Justification attaches first to systems of beliefs, in so far as they are internally coherent, as viewed from the perspective of the subject whose beliefs they are.
openaire +1 more source
In The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, Laurence BonJour defends a coherence theory of justification as part of a standard analysis of knowledge as justified true belief. Justification attaches first to systems of beliefs, in so far as they are internally coherent, as viewed from the perspective of the subject whose beliefs they are.
openaire +1 more source
Analysis, 2007
In ‘A reductio of coherentism’ Tom Stoneham offers an interesting and novel argument against epistemological coherentism. ‘On the face of it’, he writes, ‘the argument gives a conclusive reductio ad absurdum of any coherence theory of justification. But that cannot be right, can it?’ (2007: 254).
openaire +1 more source
In ‘A reductio of coherentism’ Tom Stoneham offers an interesting and novel argument against epistemological coherentism. ‘On the face of it’, he writes, ‘the argument gives a conclusive reductio ad absurdum of any coherence theory of justification. But that cannot be right, can it?’ (2007: 254).
openaire +1 more source
1994
Abstract Coherentists attempt to solve the problem of infinite regress by rejecting what they sometimes call “the linear conception of knowledge.” Coherentists adopt, instead, a holistic conception of justification. This chapter examines BonJour's efforts to develop a coherentist account of empirical knowledge.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Coherentists attempt to solve the problem of infinite regress by rejecting what they sometimes call “the linear conception of knowledge.” Coherentists adopt, instead, a holistic conception of justification. This chapter examines BonJour's efforts to develop a coherentist account of empirical knowledge.
openaire +1 more source
Synthese, 2006
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +1 more source
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +1 more source