Results 31 to 40 of about 1,242,848 (250)
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, 2021 Background and aims: Current guidelines recommend colonoscopy every 3–5 years for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening of individuals with a familial history of CRC. The objective of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of screening alternatives
Robert Benamouzig +6 more
doaj +1 more source
Cost Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy Depends on Adequate Bowel Preparation Rates - A Modeling Study. [PDF]
PLoS ONE, 2016 Inadequate bowel preparation during screening colonoscopy necessitates repeating colonoscopy. Studies suggest inadequate bowel preparation rates of 20-60%.
James Kingsley +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Hepatology, EarlyView., 2022 In this study of the gut mucosal microbiota in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), we found consistent microbiota features associated with PSC and recurrent PSC, PSC with inflammatory bowel disease and a persistent gut dysbiosis after liver transplantation Abstract Background and Aims Several characteristic features of the fecal microbiota have been ...
Mikal Jacob Hole +12 more
wiley +1 more source
Improvement in adenoma detection using a novel artificial intelligence-aided polyp detection device
Endoscopy International Open, 2021 Background and study aims Detecting colorectal neoplasia is the goal of high-quality screening and surveillance colonoscopy, as reflected by high adenoma detection rate (ADR) and adenomas per colonoscopy (APC).
Aasma Shaukat +8 more
doaj +1 more source
PROXIMAL SERRATED POLYP DETECTION RATE: A COMPLEMENTARY QUALITY INDICATOR FOR ADENOMA DETECTION RATE? [PDF]
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, 2020 BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening depends on quality indicators, which adenoma detection rate (ADR) being the most important. Proximal serrated polyp detection rate (pSPDR) has been studied as a potential
Fernando Antônio Vieira LEITE +5 more
doaj +1 more source
Polyp detection rates as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy
Endoscopy International Open, 2019 Background Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates (ADR and PDR) are advocated as general performance measures for screening and clinical colonoscopy, but their evidence is largely derived from screening data.
G. Hoff +8 more
doaj +1 more source
Adherence to physician recommendations for surveillance in opportunistic colorectal cancer screening: the necessity of organized surveillance. [PDF]
PLoS ONE, 2013 BACKGROUND: Limited evidence exists on the utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. We assessed adherence to physician recommendations for surveillance in opportunistic CRC screening in Germany.
Christian Stock +5 more
doaj +1 more source
Case Reports in Gastroenterology, 2022 Colonoscopy is used worldwide for screening colon cancer. Routine colonoscopy is considered a safe procedure with relatively fewer adverse events. We present a case of intracolonic and retroperitoneal hematoma following a routine colonoscopy.
Ayesha Jalal +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Detectability of colorectal neoplasia with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) [PDF]
, 2011 The purpose of this study was to analyze the detectability of colorectal neoplasia with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). Data for a total of 492 patients who had undergone both PET/CT
Saito, Shunsuke +25 more
core +1 more source
PLoS Medicine, 2023 BackgroundColonoscopy screening is underused by first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with non-syndromic colorectal cancer (CRC) with screening completion rates below 50%.
Natalia González-López +30 more
doaj +1 more source