Results 61 to 70 of about 148,837 (212)
The Right Not to be Dominated: The Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights on Migrants’ Destitution [PDF]
The European Court of Human Rights increasingly deals with migrants’ complaints about desti-tution in their host state under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment). This case law has been
Lieneke Slingenberg
doaj
The Art of Applying IHL: Jus In Bello in The Jurisprudence of Inter-American Human Rights Bodies [PDF]
Due to the ECHR’s decision regarding the request for interim measures lodged by Armenia against Azerbaijan with respect to an armed conflict, the issue of giving international humanitarian law (IHL) relevance through the jurisprudence of regional human ...
Ana Jabauri
doaj
Unitarianism with Attributes of Regionalism – Certain Aspects and Relevant Georgian Context [PDF]
The territorial organisation of Georgia in the current context is difficult to describe with complete precision, but it can be defined as unitarianism with regional autonomies. In this respect, the regional autonomies are the Autonomous Republic of Ajara
Tinatin Erkvania
doaj
Using Inherent Judicial Power in a State-Level Budget Dispute [PDF]
State courts are in financial crisis. Since the mid-1990s, state legislatures have allowed funding for their judicial systems to stagnate or dwindle. With diminished resources, state courts have struggled to provide adequate access to justice and dispute
Yates, Andrew W.
core +1 more source
ABSTRACT Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization was one of the most pivotal cases regarding reproductive health and women's rights in recent history. The case resulted in the removal of the constitutional right to abortion for women across the United States.
Zaid Ahmed +5 more
wiley +1 more source
Functional Analysis of the Plain-Error Rule [PDF]
In this article, I attempt to do two things at once. First, I attempt to analyze the Supreme Court\u27s jurisdiction to conduct plain-error review of state court decisions.
Spann, Girardeau A
core +1 more source
Transatlantic Anti‐Catholic Networks, Bibles and School Disputes in the Nineteenth Century
In the later nineteenth century, British, Canadian and American Evangelicals set up transatlantic religious networks to fight the Catholic Church and to affirm their Protestant Anglophone identities. Accordingly, Evangelical militants perceived their struggle as being transnational despite the diametrically different State–Church relationship contexts ...
Geraldine Vaughan
wiley +1 more source
Defference to The Executive in The United States after September 11 [PDF]
The deference thesis is that Congress and the judiciary should defer to the executive’s policy judgments during national emergencies. Criticism of the deference theory draws on the analogy of the emergency room medical protocol to argue that emergencies ...
Eric A. Posner
doaj
The beginning of 2020 marked an unexpected turn for the world, the global pandemic of COVID-19 has affected every aspect of life. It has also created an unprecedented opportunity for governments to justify the expansion of their surveillance and ...
Clarisa Long
doaj
Data‐Driven Accommodations: Testing Religious Exemptions in Markets With Discrimination
ABSTRACT When conflicts between religious wedding vendors and same‐sex couples arise, courts and legislatures face a dilemma. Existing empirical work such as audit studies and field experiments shows that religious exemptions may lead to higher refusal rates for same‐sex couples seeking wedding services.
Brady Earley
wiley +1 more source

