Results 161 to 170 of about 83,030 (207)

Electrophysiological correlates of presuppositional inference in contrastive focus. [PDF]

Front Hum Neurosci
Yang Z, Nie H, Paterson KB, Li S, Chen L.   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Children's Processing of Written Ironic Praise and Ironic Criticism: Evidence from Eye-Tracking Analyses. [PDF]

Behav Sci (Basel)
Zhong J, Liu J.
europepmc   +1 more source

Conversational technology and reactions to withheld information. [PDF]

PLoS One
Gurney N, Loewenstein G, Chater N.
europepmc   +1 more source

Inside regular lab meetings: The social construction of a research team and ideas in optical physics. [PDF]

Soc Stud Sci
Philipps A, Paruschke L.
europepmc   +1 more source

Pragmatics as Social Inference About Intentional Action. [PDF]

Open Mind (Camb)
Bohn M, Frank MC.
europepmc   +1 more source

"That was really a productive segment, wasn't it?" Nonverbal markers of humor in the American presidential debates of 2016 and 2020. [PDF]

Front Psychol
Tabacaru S.
europepmc   +1 more source

Generalized Conversational Implicature

Generalized Conversational Implicature
openaire   +1 more source

Conversational Implicature [PDF]

, 2018
Abstract Conversational implicatures (i) are implied by the speaker in making an utterance; (ii) are part of the content of the utterance, but (iii) do not contribute to direct (or explicit) utterance content; and (iv) are not encoded by the linguistic meaning of what has been uttered. In (1), Amelia asserts that she is on a diet, and
Nicholas Elwyn Allott
exaly   +6 more sources

Is Metalinguistic Usage a Conversational Implicature?

Topoi, 2023
AbstractI argue against the view that metalinguistic usage is a form of conversational implicature. That view, suggested by Thomasson (Anal Philos 57(4):1-28, 2016) and Belleri (Philos Stud 174(9):2211–2226, 2017), has been most recently fleshed out by Mankowitz (Synthese 199:5603–5622, 2021).
Andres Soria-Ruiz
exaly   +3 more sources

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Conversational Implicatures and Cancellability

Acta Analytica, 2009
In this paper I argue against a criticism by Matthew Weiner to Grice’s thesis that cancellability is a necessary condition for conversational implicature. I argue that the purported counterexamples fail because the supposed failed cancellation in the cases Weiner presents is not meant as a cancellation but as a reinforcement of the implicature.
Steffen Börge
exaly   +2 more sources