Results 221 to 230 of about 657,420 (260)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
An aggregate measure for benefit–cost analysis
Ecological Economics, 2006The Kaldor–Hicks (KH) criterion has long been the standard for benefit–cost analyses, but it has also been widely criticized as ignoring equity and, arguably, moral sentiments in general. We suggest the use of an aggregate measure (KHM) instead of KH, where M stands for moral sentiments.
Bauman, Yoram +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Cost-Benefit and Cost-Effective Analysis in Surgery
Surgical Clinics of North America, 1982Cost-benefit analysis and cost-effective analysis are formal analytical methods to provide a rational, objective means of comparing total costs with total benefits or of comparing effects in the selection of competing programs for financial support.
openaire +2 more sources
benefit–cost analysis (cost–benefit analysis)
2010David Levinson, Michael Corbett
openaire +1 more source
Cost-Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
New England Journal of Medicine, 1981openaire +2 more sources
Cost–benefit analysis: identification of costs and benefits
2014Imad A. Moosa, Vikash Ramiah
openaire +1 more source
Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: A cost–benefit analysis
Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018Jingke Hong +2 more
exaly
Probability Distribution for Benefit/Cost Ratio and Net Benefit
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management - ASCE, 1992Yeou-Koung Tung, Tung Yeou-Koung
exaly
The relationship between cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-benefit analysis
Social Science and Medicine, 1995Magnus Johannesson
exaly