Results 141 to 150 of about 148,978 (203)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Psychiatric Quarterly, 1992
Participating in a medical/legal situation is quite different from the ordinary office or hospital experience and requires the expert to see that all of the new parameters are clarified. A thorough and complete evaluation with a review of all the pertinent records and interviews with ancillary individuals is necessary, as is good preparation by way of ...
openaire +2 more sources
Participating in a medical/legal situation is quite different from the ordinary office or hospital experience and requires the expert to see that all of the new parameters are clarified. A thorough and complete evaluation with a review of all the pertinent records and interviews with ancillary individuals is necessary, as is good preparation by way of ...
openaire +2 more sources
2021
Abstract “Courtroom workgroup” is a term used to describe the ongoing relationships between judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys. These three interrelated relationships define how the central figures operate and indeed how a case progresses. The authors survey the existing literature on such workgroups and conduct twelve interviews
Milton Heumann, Rick Kavin, Anu Chugh
openaire +1 more source
Abstract “Courtroom workgroup” is a term used to describe the ongoing relationships between judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys. These three interrelated relationships define how the central figures operate and indeed how a case progresses. The authors survey the existing literature on such workgroups and conduct twelve interviews
Milton Heumann, Rick Kavin, Anu Chugh
openaire +1 more source
2000
Abstract It used to be easy to define courtroom films: They were dramas in which the main character was a heroic lawyer who solved the mystery and settled other dilemmas in the course of a trial. But this traditional definition has eroded. Contemporary movies, stressing activities that do not naturally occur in the courtroom, such as gun
openaire +1 more source
Abstract It used to be easy to define courtroom films: They were dramas in which the main character was a heroic lawyer who solved the mystery and settled other dilemmas in the course of a trial. But this traditional definition has eroded. Contemporary movies, stressing activities that do not naturally occur in the courtroom, such as gun
openaire +1 more source
Dangerously Neglecting Courtroom Realities
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2016SummaryBrewin and Andrews recently argued that expert witnesses should be cautious when informing the legal arena about the potential for false memories. We argue that memory researchers—whose studies often were inspired by miscarriages of justice due to erroneous statements provided by witnesses, victims, or defendants—can and should emphasize the ...
Smeets, Tom +3 more
openaire +1 more source
2023
Abstract Ephraim Avery’s trial for murder begins in Newport, Rhode Island, in May 1833. The lead prosecutors are State Attorney General Albert C. Greene and Congressman Dutee Pearce; Avery’s defense attorneys are Richard Randolph and New England’s most celebrated trial lawyer, Jeremiah Mason.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Ephraim Avery’s trial for murder begins in Newport, Rhode Island, in May 1833. The lead prosecutors are State Attorney General Albert C. Greene and Congressman Dutee Pearce; Avery’s defense attorneys are Richard Randolph and New England’s most celebrated trial lawyer, Jeremiah Mason.
openaire +1 more source
Law & Society Review, 1971
This is a study of the criminal trial court as a formal organization. The processing of defendants through court can be seen simply as a task for the courtroom personnel—the cases presenting not only occasions for moral outrage or legal acumen but also presenting problems for the legal bureaucracy as such.
openaire +1 more source
This is a study of the criminal trial court as a formal organization. The processing of defendants through court can be seen simply as a task for the courtroom personnel—the cases presenting not only occasions for moral outrage or legal acumen but also presenting problems for the legal bureaucracy as such.
openaire +1 more source
Psychiatric Services, 1984
The courts’ response to the potential contribution of hypnosis to the fact-finding process is illustrative of the consequences of a broader judicial desire for assistance from the mental health professions. Time and again, in their eagerness to facilitate the difficult process of adjudication, the courts have shown themselves susceptible to the ...
openaire +2 more sources
The courts’ response to the potential contribution of hypnosis to the fact-finding process is illustrative of the consequences of a broader judicial desire for assistance from the mental health professions. Time and again, in their eagerness to facilitate the difficult process of adjudication, the courts have shown themselves susceptible to the ...
openaire +2 more sources
The University of Chicago Law Review, 1951
Lloyd Paul Stryker, Quentin Reynolds
openaire +2 more sources
Lloyd Paul Stryker, Quentin Reynolds
openaire +2 more sources