Results 251 to 260 of about 56,111 (303)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Optical diagnosis of T1 CRCs and treatment consequences in the Dutch CRC screening programme
Gut, 2020With great interest, we have read the article by Backes et al ,1 on the pre-resection accuracy of the real-time optical diagnosis of T1 colorectal cancer (T1CRC) in large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. In this multicentre, prospective study, the authors developed and validated the OPTICAL model, in which a sensitivity of 78.7% (95% CI: 64.3 to 89 ...
Lonne W T Meulen +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
From Qualitative Data to GP Training on CRC Screening
Journal of Cancer Education, 2013Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. In France, although mass screening has been performed using the guaiac fecal occult blood test since 2008, the participation rate remains too low. Previous studies have explored the perspectives of doctors and patients as well as the performance of general practitioners (GPs) by ...
Aubin-Auger, Isabelle +9 more
openaire +3 more sources
Variations in CRC Screening Practice: Would This Patient Be Screened?
Health Outcomes Research in Medicine, 2010Abstract Purpose Screening rates for colorectal cancer (CRC) in the United States were below the goal of 50% outlined in Healthy People 2010. Physician recommendation is an important predictor of patient compliance. We compared physician CRC screening decision processes (as depicted in decision trees) and examined how variations in decision ...
Sarah B. Wackerbarth +3 more
openaire +1 more source
Temporal trends in colorectal cancer screening (CRCS).
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013356 Background: The rate of CRCS continues to be suboptimal. Our study objectives were to characterize temporal trends in CRCS in general and within specific subpopulations and identify clinical and system factors that pose barriers to CRCS. Methods: Data from respondents aged ≥50 years who were classified as average risk (no personal or family ...
Siddhartha Das +2 more
openaire +1 more source
CRC: FIT-Screening reduziert Inzidenz fortgeschrittener Stadien
Im Fokus Onkologie, 2019Durch den fakalen immunologischen Bluttest (FIT) lasst sich die Inzidenz von metastasiertem bzw. fortgeschrittenem Kolorektalkarzinom (CRC) bereits innerhalb der ersten Screeningrunde im Vergleich zu Nichtgescreenten vermindern; die Inzidenz von metastasiertem CRC ist um 70% reduziert.
openaire +1 more source
Screening for CRC Using CT Colonography
2011Air contrast barium enema (ACBE), flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy have been used to image the colon for many years. In recent years, a number of new techniques to image the colon have been introduced and prominent among these is computed tomographic (CT) colonography (also called “CTC,” “CT colography,” or “virtual colonoscopy”).
openaire +1 more source
Colorectal cancer: Strategies to minimize interval CRC in screening programmes.
Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2016The interval colorectal cancer rate is a robust indicator of the quality and effectiveness of a screening programme, enabling the identification of unmet requirements and development of specific strategies to resolve them. A recent study demonstrated the use of interval cancer as an indicator to target quality improvement of colonoscopy in a screening ...
Dekker, Evelien, Sanduleanu, Silvia
openaire +3 more sources
Colonoscopy screening and risk of CRC
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2022openaire +2 more sources
More comprehensive discussion of CRC screening associated with higher screening.
The American journal of managed care, 2014Examine association of comprehensiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening discussion by primary care physicians (PCPs) with completion of CRC screening.Observational study in Kaiser Permanente Northwest, a group-model health maintenance organization.A total of 883 participants overdue for CRC screening received an automated telephone call (ATC ...
David M, Mosen +8 more
openaire +1 more source
CRC risk knowledge does not affect screening compliance
The Lancet Oncology, 2014New research suggests that individualised genetic and environ mental risk assessment (GERA) for colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility does not improve screening adherence in people with an average risk for this cancer. David Weinberg (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA) and colleagues postulated that pro viding patients who had an average risk
openaire +1 more source