Results 61 to 70 of about 89 (87)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2004
Abstract Approaches to paraconsistency can be arranged on a spectrum similar to the way in which approaches to vagueness are often understood. On the left are the metaphysical realists; those who think that there are real contradictory facts, that are mind and language independent.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Approaches to paraconsistency can be arranged on a spectrum similar to the way in which approaches to vagueness are often understood. On the left are the metaphysical realists; those who think that there are real contradictory facts, that are mind and language independent.
openaire +1 more source
History and Philosophy of Logic, 2021
The aim of this paper is to lay bare the roots of dialetheism in discussions about dialectics and dialectical logic at the time of the first development of paraconsistent logics.
openaire +1 more source
The aim of this paper is to lay bare the roots of dialetheism in discussions about dialectics and dialectical logic at the time of the first development of paraconsistent logics.
openaire +1 more source
Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 2011
Dialetheism is the view that there are true contradictions. Classical dialetheism holds further the view that the law of excluded middle is indeed a logical law. Most famous dialetheists, such as G. Priest and J. Beall, are classical dialetheists; they take classical dialetheism to be the only plausible solution to the semantic paradoxes.
openaire +1 more source
Dialetheism is the view that there are true contradictions. Classical dialetheism holds further the view that the law of excluded middle is indeed a logical law. Most famous dialetheists, such as G. Priest and J. Beall, are classical dialetheists; they take classical dialetheism to be the only plausible solution to the semantic paradoxes.
openaire +1 more source
2008
AbstractThis chapter surveys a number of dialetheic theories, pointing out some difficulties with each. The theories differ over the kind of conditionals they contain. The dialetheic theory that in some ways does best among those now known is based on the semantics of Chapters 16 and 17; however, it is somewhat unsatisfactory in not allowing reasoning ...
openaire +1 more source
AbstractThis chapter surveys a number of dialetheic theories, pointing out some difficulties with each. The theories differ over the kind of conditionals they contain. The dialetheic theory that in some ways does best among those now known is based on the semantics of Chapters 16 and 17; however, it is somewhat unsatisfactory in not allowing reasoning ...
openaire +1 more source
2004
Abstract Dialetheism is the view that there are true contradictions. The strongest argument in favour of dialetheism is that it alone allows us to solve semantic paradoxes like the liar paradox. This chapter presents two main criticisms of dialetheism.
Greg Littmann, Keith Simmons
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Dialetheism is the view that there are true contradictions. The strongest argument in favour of dialetheism is that it alone allows us to solve semantic paradoxes like the liar paradox. This chapter presents two main criticisms of dialetheism.
Greg Littmann, Keith Simmons
openaire +1 more source
Informal provability and dialetheism
Theoria, 2023According to the dialetheist argument from the inconsistency of informal mathematics, the informal version of the Gödelian argument leads us to a true contradiction.On one hand, the dialetheist argues, we can prove that there is a mathematical claim that is neither provable nor refutable in informal mathematics.
openaire
2004
Abstract Dialetheists think that their rejection of ex falso quodlibet means that they cannot be saddled with the claim that anything whatsoever is true. But what precisely is wrong with trivialism, as Priest calls the position that everything is indeed true (and also false)?
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Dialetheists think that their rejection of ex falso quodlibet means that they cannot be saddled with the claim that anything whatsoever is true. But what precisely is wrong with trivialism, as Priest calls the position that everything is indeed true (and also false)?
openaire +1 more source
Paraconsistent Dialetheism and Soundness
2008AbstractPriest has argued that his dialetheic theories declare themselves sound and in this regard are better than non-dialetheic theories. This chapter shows this to be unfounded. Indeed, dialetheic theories cannot on pain of triviality declare modus ponens to be truth-preserving, and those that accept excluded middle declare it not to be.
openaire +1 more source