Results 41 to 50 of about 109 (102)
The Fictional Guide to Impossible Truths
In this paper, our main goal is to present a new account for contradictions and impossible truths. It is loosely based on both Austin’s account of truth and the Logic of Impossible Truths (LIT), a formal semantics designed to address incomplete ...
Guilherme Araújo Cardoso +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Scientific Pluralism, Consistency Preservation, and Inconsistency Toleration
Scientific (disunity) pluralism is the view according to which there is a plurality of scientific domains and of scientific theories, and these theories are empirically adequate relative to their own respective domains.
Otávio Bueno
doaj
Anti-Exceptionalism About Requirements of Epistemic Rationality. [PDF]
Field C.
europepmc +1 more source
Objective consequentialism and the plurality of chances. [PDF]
Wroński L.
europepmc +1 more source
Una sintesi dialettica tra tradizioni differenti. Il caso Hegel
A Dialectical Synthesis Between Different Traditions. The Case Hegel - The recent interest in Hegel by such thinkers as Robert Brandom and John McDowell in the United States and Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer in Germany has inserted the dialectic into the ...
Howard Ponzer
doaj
Eliminativism, Dialetheism and Moore's Paradox
AbstractJohn Turri gives an example that he thinks refutes what he takes to be “G.E.Moore's view” that omissive assertions such as “It is raining butIdo not believe that it is raining” are “inherently ‘absurd'”. This is that ofEllie, an eliminativist who makes such assertions. Turri thinks that these are perfectly reasonable and not even absurd.
openaire +3 more sources
Decoding the Molecular and Mutational Ambiguities of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Pathobiology. [PDF]
Kidd M, Modlin IM, Bodei L, Drozdov I.
europepmc +1 more source
The entailment connective is introduced by Priest (2006b). It aims to capture, in a dialetheically acceptable way, the informal notion of logical consequence. This connective does not “fall foul” of Curry’s Paradox by invalidating an inference rule called “Absorption” (or “Contraction”) and the classical logical theorem called “Assertion”.
CARRARA, MASSIMILIANO +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Rational belief, epistemic possibility, and the a priori. [PDF]
Field C.
europepmc +1 more source
One Heresy and One Orthodoxy: On Dialetheism, Dimathematism, and the Non-normativity of Logic. [PDF]
Wansing H.
europepmc +1 more source

