Results 61 to 70 of about 109 (102)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2016
A contradiction is any sentence of the form “P and not P,” a sentence together with its negation. Dialetheism is the thesis that some contradictions are true: some true sentences have true negations. It is the claim that there are truth-value gluts. It is a thesis about truth and sharply at odds with a lot of philosophy going back to Aristotle.
openaire +1 more source
A contradiction is any sentence of the form “P and not P,” a sentence together with its negation. Dialetheism is the thesis that some contradictions are true: some true sentences have true negations. It is the claim that there are truth-value gluts. It is a thesis about truth and sharply at odds with a lot of philosophy going back to Aristotle.
openaire +1 more source
History and Philosophy of Logic, 2013
In this article, I consider the possibility of interpreting Hegel's dialectic as dialetheism. After a first basic recapitulation about the meaning of the words ‘dialetheism’ and ‘dialectic’ and a consideration of Priest's own account of the relation between dialectical and dialetheic logic in 1989, I discuss some controversial issues, not directly ...
openaire +1 more source
In this article, I consider the possibility of interpreting Hegel's dialectic as dialetheism. After a first basic recapitulation about the meaning of the words ‘dialetheism’ and ‘dialectic’ and a consideration of Priest's own account of the relation between dialectical and dialetheic logic in 1989, I discuss some controversial issues, not directly ...
openaire +1 more source
1987
AbstractThis chapter focuses on the aim of this book, namely, to argue for the existence of dialetheias, and to discuss their logic, epistemology, and some issues in their metaphysics. It provides an introduction to dialetheism, via a brief discussion of Kant and Hegel.
openaire +1 more source
AbstractThis chapter focuses on the aim of this book, namely, to argue for the existence of dialetheias, and to discuss their logic, epistemology, and some issues in their metaphysics. It provides an introduction to dialetheism, via a brief discussion of Kant and Hegel.
openaire +1 more source
Rational belief and Dialetheism
Intercultural Pragmatics, 2021AbstractIt is usually maintained that a subject with manifestly contradictory beliefs is irrational. How can we account, then, for the intuitive rationality ofdialetheists, who believe that some manifest contradictions are true? My paper aims to answer this question.
openaire +1 more source
2008
In this article, 1) we will start by explaining the connection between dialetheism and other important related concepts, such as the ones of trivialism and paraconsistency. Next, we will describe 2) the history of dialetheism and 3) the motivations for the modern dialetheic renaissance, among which the logical (semantic and set-theoretic) paradoxes ...
Priest, Graham, Berto, Francesco
openaire +1 more source
In this article, 1) we will start by explaining the connection between dialetheism and other important related concepts, such as the ones of trivialism and paraconsistency. Next, we will describe 2) the history of dialetheism and 3) the motivations for the modern dialetheic renaissance, among which the logical (semantic and set-theoretic) paradoxes ...
Priest, Graham, Berto, Francesco
openaire +1 more source
Minimalism and the Dialetheic Challenge
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2003Minimalists, following Horwich, claim that all that can be said about truth is comprised by all and only the nonparadoxical instances of (E) ⟨ p ⟩ is true iff p. It is, accordingly, standard in the literature on truth and paradox to ask how the minimalist will restrict (E) so as to rule out paradox-inducing sentences (alternatively: propositions).
B. Armour-Garb, J. Beall
openaire +1 more source
2004
Abstract According to dialetheists, the ‘liar paradox’ constitutes a sound argument to a true contradiction. But in the standard view, a paradox is an apparently unacceptable conclusion derived from apparently acceptable premises by apparently acceptable reasoning.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract According to dialetheists, the ‘liar paradox’ constitutes a sound argument to a true contradiction. But in the standard view, a paradox is an apparently unacceptable conclusion derived from apparently acceptable premises by apparently acceptable reasoning.
openaire +1 more source
2004
Abstract For accommodating defective utterances within compositional semantics, truth-value gaps (Kleene's 3-valued logic) and gluts (Priest's LP) are equally efficient, but in terms of classical logic gaps yield harmless incompleteness, whereas gluts precipitate collapse; ex contradictione quodlibet.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract For accommodating defective utterances within compositional semantics, truth-value gaps (Kleene's 3-valued logic) and gluts (Priest's LP) are equally efficient, but in terms of classical logic gaps yield harmless incompleteness, whereas gluts precipitate collapse; ex contradictione quodlibet.
openaire +1 more source
2004
Abstract Approaches to paraconsistency can be arranged on a spectrum similar to the way in which approaches to vagueness are often understood. On the left are the metaphysical realists; those who think that there are real contradictory facts, that are mind and language independent.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Approaches to paraconsistency can be arranged on a spectrum similar to the way in which approaches to vagueness are often understood. On the left are the metaphysical realists; those who think that there are real contradictory facts, that are mind and language independent.
openaire +1 more source