Results 271 to 280 of about 165,090 (316)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Pseudo-Sensility: Osler's Dictum Reconsidered
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1961W. Penfield
openaire +3 more sources
Occam's Razor or Hickam's Dictum?
Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology, 2012Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic, inflammatory disorder characterized by non-necrotizing granulomas that can infiltrate almost any organ but involves the lungs most commonly. The exact pathogenesis of sarcoidosis remains unclear. Histoplasmosis is an infection caused by Histoplasma capsulatum that also predominantly affects the lungs and is characterized
Nishant, Gupta +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
Austrian History Yearbook, 1965
After the formation of the Conference Group for Central European History in December, 1957, and the appointment by it of a Committee to promote Studies of the History of the Habsburg Monarchy, the present writer, in his capacity as executive secretary of this committee, made a survey of publications and research projects in the United States and Canada
openaire +1 more source
After the formation of the Conference Group for Central European History in December, 1957, and the appointment by it of a Committee to promote Studies of the History of the Habsburg Monarchy, the present writer, in his capacity as executive secretary of this committee, made a survey of publications and research projects in the United States and Canada
openaire +1 more source
Topoi, 2003
The dictum “To exist is to have causal powers” is discussed sympathetically by Plato in The Sophist 246E‐248A. The question what this slogan means in Plato’s language, is a challenge for a scholar. To ask what it means in our common language risks raising a complex question.
openaire +1 more source
The dictum “To exist is to have causal powers” is discussed sympathetically by Plato in The Sophist 246E‐248A. The question what this slogan means in Plato’s language, is a challenge for a scholar. To ask what it means in our common language risks raising a complex question.
openaire +1 more source
2018
This chapter defines the difference between holding and dictum and explains their respective authority in legal reasoning. It states that a holding is the tribunal's judgment on an issue necessary to resolve the case, while a dictum is an unnecessary statement that does not carry binding force.
openaire +1 more source
This chapter defines the difference between holding and dictum and explains their respective authority in legal reasoning. It states that a holding is the tribunal's judgment on an issue necessary to resolve the case, while a dictum is an unnecessary statement that does not carry binding force.
openaire +1 more source
Journal of Philosophical Research, 2008
Consider the claim that if there were macrophysical objects, they would cause things. Trenton Merricks takes this to be an obviously true claim, and he puts it to work in his argument for eliminating some (alleged) macrophysical objects. In this short paper, I argue that the claim in question-Merricks's Dictum-is not obviously true, and may even be ...
openaire +1 more source
Consider the claim that if there were macrophysical objects, they would cause things. Trenton Merricks takes this to be an obviously true claim, and he puts it to work in his argument for eliminating some (alleged) macrophysical objects. In this short paper, I argue that the claim in question-Merricks's Dictum-is not obviously true, and may even be ...
openaire +1 more source
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017
Presumably, the terms holding and dictum have some objective meaning. One would not say, “I do not agree with this statement, so it is dictum.” One might say, “This statement is dictum, so it is not binding.” So what, then, is dictum? More specifically, to what extent does the breadth of a generalization affect its status as holding or dictum?
openaire +1 more source
Presumably, the terms holding and dictum have some objective meaning. One would not say, “I do not agree with this statement, so it is dictum.” One might say, “This statement is dictum, so it is not binding.” So what, then, is dictum? More specifically, to what extent does the breadth of a generalization affect its status as holding or dictum?
openaire +1 more source