Results 241 to 250 of about 3,562,253 (279)

Differential object marking in French

open access: yes, 2023
Abstract This study is dedicated to the question whether French possesses (optional) DOM, i.e. direct object marking, which it answers in a negative way. French is traditionally considered to lack a differential marker for the direct object (cf. e.g. Körner, 1987
Binder, Larissa, Stark, Elisabeth
openaire   +3 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Differential object marking

2023
AbstractChapter 8 is dedicated to the noun types that have been identified in the previous chapters as DOM-marked. This is the case for a class of nouns in Tamil and Korean. As expected, these noun types do not show any movement restrictions, akin to case-marked objects in the respective languages. Moreover, their binding, control, and scope properties
exaly   +2 more sources

Parametric variation in differential object marking in Italo-Romance [PDF]

open access: yesLinguistik Aktuell, 2023
This article provides an exhaustive review of the known variation found in the distribution of differerential object marking across the dialects of Italy, including those of central and northern Italy, in order to identify the relevant dimensions of ...
Adam Ledgeway
exaly   +4 more sources

On the nature of differential object marking

Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2018
Theodore Levin
exaly   +2 more sources

Differential object marking in Catalan

Linguistic Variation, 2021
AbstractIn this paper we provide a comprehensive picture of differential object marking in Catalan, focusing on both the empirical facts and their theoretical contribution. We support some important conclusions. First, Catalan differential object marking is quite a robust and widespread phenomenon, contrary to what prescriptive grammars assume. Second,
Monica Alexandrina Irimia, Anna Pineda
openaire   +1 more source

Differential object marking in Tigrinya

Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 2009
Tigrinya, a Semitic language spoken in Eritrea and Ethiopia, is one of about 300 known languages world-wide that mark certain direct object nominals while leaving others unmarked. Cross-linguistically, this phenomenon, known as differential object marking (DOM), is most often correlated with the relative definiteness and/or animacy of the object.
Dirk Kievit, Saliem Kievit
openaire   +1 more source

Differential object marking in Basque varieties

2016
This chapter studies Differential Object Marking (DOM) in nonstandard varieties of Basque. DOM in Basque overtly resembles a common DOM pattern of coding direct as indirect objects in both case and agreement, that is absolutives as datives, according to their animacy and specificity, as in Spanish and Hindi-Urdu.
Fernández, Beatriz, Rezac, Milan
openaire   +2 more sources

Differential object marking in P’orhépecha

Studies in Language, 2020
Abstract This paper analyzes Differential Object Marking in P’orhépecha, which involves split case and fluid case alternations. Although this system is sensitive to Animacy and Definiteness, I will show that prominence on these scales does not account for the distribution of flagging.
openaire   +1 more source

Differential object marking in heritage and homeland Italian

2022
Abstract We examine variable patterns of use of differential object marking (DOM) in conversational Italian recorded in Toronto, Canada, and Calabria, Italy. An exhaustive sample of 366 direct objects, produced by Homeland and three generations of Heritage speakers, shows retention of ...
Margherita Di Salvo, Naomi Nagy
openaire   +2 more sources

Differential Object Marking in Romance

2023
Differential marking as applied to direct objects has long been discussed as one of the characterizing traits of many Romance languages. There is, however, wide consensus that a detailed investigation into the nature of this phenomenon raises numerous challenges both at the empirical and theoretical level.
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy