Results 211 to 220 of about 62,070 (260)

The discriminant validity of the Eating Disorder Inventory‐2

British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1997
The scores of 78 bulimia nervosa (BN) patients and 67 general psychiatric outpatients on the Revised Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI‐2) were compared in a multivariate discriminant analysis. The bulimia scale was found to correctly classify 97 per cent of all cases.
Schoemaker, C., Verbraak, M., Breteler, M.H.M., Staak, C. van der   +3 more
openaire   +4 more sources

ENRICH MARITAL INVENTORY: A DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY AND CROSS‐VALIDATION ASSESSMENT

Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1989
To assess the validity and clinical utility of the marital inventory ENRICH, a discriminant validity study was conducted using a national sample of 5039 married couples. The sample was randomly split in order to form a cross‐validation group. ENRICH is a multidimensional scale and two types of analysis were conducted to assess the value of these ...
B J, Fowers, D H, Olson
openaire   +2 more sources

Discriminant validity of the Crown–Crisp Experiential Index

British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1987
The discriminative power of the CCEI subscales was examined. Several approaches were undertaken on the responses from subjects in three neurotically disturbed groups and a normal control group. Analyses indicated that simple cut‐off points could discriminate effectively an ‘adjusted‐neurotic’ dimension; simple cut‐off points were relatively more ...
Burgess, P. M., Mazzocco, L., Campbell, I. M.   +2 more
openaire   +4 more sources

Which Should it Be Called: Convergent Validity or Discriminant Validity?

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000
(2000). Which Should it Be Called: Convergent Validity or Discriminant Validity? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport: Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 190-194.
openaire   +2 more sources

THE DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF ENTREPRENEURIAL PASSION.

Academy of Management Proceedings, 2009
We conducted two studies to develop and test a multi-dimensional measure of entrepreneurial passion.
MELISSA S. CARDON, CHRISTOPHER E. STEVENS   +1 more
openaire   +1 more source

Age discrimination in the workplace: Validation of the Nordic Age Discrimination Scale (NADS)

Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2010
Due to population ageing, older workers will make up a larger proportion of the workforce. However, recent reports show an increase in perceived age discrimination among older employees. Previous research found that age discrimination may result in negative feelings, such as uselessness, powerlessness and lower self-esteem.
Trude, Furunes, Reidar J, Mykletun
openaire   +2 more sources

Can Synthetic Validity Methods Achieve Discriminant Validity?

Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2010
Our focus is on the difficulties that synthetic validity encounters in attempting to achieve discriminant validity and the implications of these difficulties. Johnson et al. (2010) acknowledge the potential problems involved in attaining discriminant validity in synthetic validity. For example, they report that Peterson et al.
Frank L. Schmidt, In-Sue Oh
openaire   +1 more source

Validation of the Coping With Discrimination Scale in Sexual Minorities

Journal of Homosexuality, 2014
The Coping With Discrimination Scale (CDS) shows promise as a self-report measure of strategies for coping with racial discrimination. To assess the psychometric properties of the measure for use with sexual minorities (i.e., gay, lesbian, bisexual, or GLB persons), a nonprobability sample of 371 GLB adults completed the instrument along with several ...
Sakkaphat T, Ngamake, Susan E, Walch, Jirapattara, Raveepatarakul   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

The Discriminative Validity of the Whitaker Index of Schizophrenic Thinking

Journal of Personality Assessment, 1978
An attempt was made to assess the discriminative validity of the WIST with a sample of psychiatric inpatients. Through the use of a standardized structured interview and a diagnostic system for schizophrenia based on the use of discriminant function analysis with nonpathognomic symptom combinations, a reliable and valid system was used to establish the
C S, Newmark, M, Simpson, T, Jones
openaire   +2 more sources

Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Five Factor Form

Assessment, 2013
The current study tests the convergent and discriminant validity of a modified version of the Five Factor Model Rating Form (FFMRF), a one-page, brief measure of the five-factor model. The Five Factor Form (FFF) explicitly identifies maladaptive variants for both poles of each of the 30 facets of the FFMRF.
Stephanie L, Rojas, Thomas A, Widiger
openaire   +2 more sources