Results 231 to 240 of about 191,759 (261)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
A DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD FOR EVALUATING ANALGESICS IN MAN
The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 1958R I, WANG, C M, GRUBER
openaire +2 more sources
[Trimetazidine versus betahistine in Ménière's disease. A double blind method].
Annales d'oto-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico faciale : bulletin de la Societe d'oto-laryngologie des hopitaux de Paris, 1990The efficacy and acceptability of trimetazidine (60 mg daily) in the treatment of Meniere's disease were compared with those of betahistine (36 mg daily) during a double-blind study spanning two months. Enrolled in the study were 45 patients (33 treated with trimetazidine, 23 with betahistine) presenting cochlear symptoms (vertigo, tinnitus, hearing ...
A, Martini, F, De Domenico
openaire +1 more source
The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific publishing: a systematic review
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022Vincenzo Berghella +2 more
exaly
[Use of prostacyclin in patients with ischemic stroke. A double-blind method II].
Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska, 1989Thirty patients with acute ischaemic stroke were allocated randomly into a group treated with prostacyclin and a group receiving placebo. The treatment was started 24 to 72 hours after the onset of stroke. Prostacyclin sodium (Wellcome, U.K. or Chinoin, HPR) or its solvent (glycine buffer) were administered intravenously once daily during 2 weeks in 6 ...
J, Huczyński +9 more
openaire +1 more source
Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal
Functional Ecology, 2023Jennifer Meyer +2 more
exaly
Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017Andrew Tomkins
exaly
DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISONS OF TOPICALLY APPLIED STEROIDS A Critical Review of Methods
British Journal of Dermatology, 1967openaire +2 more sources