Results 1 to 10 of about 2,869,850 (360)
Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics [PDF]
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2018 Background Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avoid implicit referee bias in academic publishing. The aims of this study are to analyse the demographics of corresponding authors choosing double-blind peer review and to ...
Barbara McGillivray, Elisa De Ranieri
doaj +2 more sources
Clinical evidence on the effects of saffron (Crocus Sativus L.) in anxiety and depression
World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2022 Crocus sativus L., a member of the Iridaceae family, commonly known as saffron has very much popular as both medicine and spice. Earlier saffron was used as one of the important constituents in opioid preparations for pain relief.
Vanktesh Kumar +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2022 Background: An in silico screen was performed to identify FDA approved drugs that inhibit SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro), followed by in vitro viral replication assays, and in vivo pharmacokinetic studies in mice.
Mamta K. Jain +24 more
doaj +1 more source
Double Blind Peer-Review in Logistics
Logistics, 2021 Pre-publication peer-review forms the basis for how scholarly journals assess whether an article is suitable for publication [...]
Robert Handfield
doaj +1 more source
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2023 Background There is a power imbalance between authors and reviewers in single-blind peer review. We explored how switching from single-blind to double-blind peer review affected 1) the willingness of experts to review, 2) their publication ...
Piitu Parmanne +5 more
doaj +1 more source
Double Blind Peer-Review in Philosophies
Philosophies, 2021 Peer-review has become increasingly important to the way scholarly journals assess whether a manuscript is suitable for publication [...]
Marcin J. Schroeder, Carla Aloè
doaj +1 more source
How double blind is double blind? And does it matter? [PDF]
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1976 In an apparently double blind crossover study, two experienced measurement technicians were able to identify many of the treatment periods. They most often correctly identified aspirin, a drug with prominent effects and side effects. It is argued that in many circumstances it is better to use a blind observer who is not concerned with the giving of ...
EC Huskisson, J Scott
openaire +3 more sources
Bringing Innovations to Set Up a Better Scientific Journal for Publication of Your Research
Sociobiology, 2020 The journal Sociobiology announces the adoption of a series of editorial innovations that aim to speed up review and publication time, to select high quality articles for publication, to adopt transparent and ethical editorial standards and to reinforce ...
Evandro do Nascimento Silva +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Semi‐supervised classification of fundus images combined with CNN and GCN
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Volume 23, Issue 12, December 2022., 2022 Abstract Purpose Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most serious complications of diabetes, which is a kind of fundus lesion with specific changes. Early diagnosis of DR can effectively reduce the visual damage caused by DR. Due to the variety and different morphology of DR lesions, automatic classification of fundus images in mass screening can ...
Sixu Duan +8 more
wiley +1 more source
Does double-blind peer-review reduce bias? Evidence from a top computer science conference [PDF]
, 2021 Peer review is widely regarded as essential for advancing scientific research. However, reviewers may be biased by authors' prestige or other characteristics. Double-blind peer review, in which the authors' identities are masked from the reviewers, has been proposed as a way to reduce reviewer bias. Although intuitive, evidence for the effectiveness of
arxiv +1 more source