Results 1 to 10 of about 984,880 (314)
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review [PDF]
Royal Society Open Science, 2016 Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability ...
Richard D. Morey +12 more
doaj +14 more sources
A new forum for research on research integrity and peer review [PDF]
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2016 This editorial explains why we are launching Research Integrity and Peer Review, a new open-access journal that will provide a home to research on ethics, reporting, and evaluation of research. We discuss how the idea to launch this journal came about and identify the gaps in knowledge where we would like to encourage more research and ...
Harriman, S +3 more
openaire +5 more sources
Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?
Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2022 Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competent reviewers, it helps to safeguard the quality, validity, authority and rigour of academic work.
Faye Holst, Kim Eggleton, Simon Harris
doaj +1 more source
Reading Peer Review – What a dataset of peer review reports can teach us about changing research culture [PDF]
, 2021 One of the first megajournals, PLOS ONE, has played a significant role in changing scholarly communication and in particular peer review, by placing an emphasis on soundness, as opposed to novelty, in published research. Drawing on a study of peer review
Gadie, Robert +9 more
core +1 more source
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences at a Glance: The Past and Present [PDF]
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences, 2023 After more than 50 years of its birth, the Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences (IJMS), formerly known as Pahlavi Medical Journal, is now regarded as a reputable, regularly published medical journal in the region.
Mohammad Reza Panjehshahin
doaj +1 more source
Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers
Rheumatology, 2021 The peer review process is essential for quality checks and validation of journal submissions. Although it has some limitations, including manipulations and biased and unfair evaluations, there is no other alternative to the system. Several peer review models are now practised, with public review being the most appropriate in view of the open science ...
Olena Zimba, Armen Gasparyan
openaire +3 more sources
Utilization and Effects of Peer‐Assisted Learning in Basic Medical Education [PDF]
, 2021 This review of the literature explored the experiences and effects of peer-assisted learning in basic medical education. Peer-assisted learning is most commonly utilized to teach clinical skills (including technical skills) and medical knowledge (76.4%).
Korean Medical Education Review (의학교육논단)
core +1 more source
BMC Medical Education, 2021 Background Research engagement contributes to the improvement of patient care. A systematic review is a suitable first scholarly activity because it entails summarization of publicly available data and usually requires neither rigorous ethical review nor
Hiraku Tsujimoto +19 more
doaj +1 more source
What You Need to Keep in Mind While Peer Reviewing a Medical Research Paper
Trends in Scholarly Publishing, 2023 Medical peer reviewing is a crucial component for ensuring the high quality of the research publications. Therefore, it follows that a peer reviewer should know his job inside out. There are key aspects of the peer-reviewing process that needs to be kept
Mrinmay Dhauria, Kaushik Bharati
doaj +1 more source
Peer Advocacy: Expressions of Loyalty in Peer Review [PDF]
, 2022 Peer review is the most legitimate form of evaluation in academia, and a pillar of many decisions and processes in education, research, and other areas of life in higher education.
Kristina Edström +3 more
core +1 more source