Results 1 to 10 of about 868,566 (109)

Guidelines for open peer review implementation [PDF]

Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2019
Open peer review (OPR) is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of researcher attitudes show important barriers to implementation.
Tony Ross-Hellauer, Edit Görögh
doaj   +2 more sources

Maintaining Live Discussion in Two-Stage Open Peer Review [PDF]

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012
Open peer review has been proposed for a number of reasons, in particular, for increasing the transparency of the article selection process for a journal, and for obtaining a broader basis for feedback to the authors and for the acceptance decision.
Erik eSandewall, Erik eSandewall
doaj   +2 more sources

Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5n1] [PDF]

F1000Research, 2015
Open peer review, peer review where authors' and reviewers' identities are disclosed to one another, is a growing trend in scholarly publishing. Through observation of four journals in STEM disciplines, PLOS One, Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, PeerJ ...
Emily Ford
doaj   +2 more sources

What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations] [PDF]

F1000Research, 2017
Background: “Open peer review” (OPR), despite being a major pillar of Open Science, has neither a standardized definition nor an agreed schema of its features and implementations.
Tony Ross-Hellauer
doaj   +2 more sources

Open peer review urgently requires evidence: A call to action [PDF]

PLoS Biology, 2023
L M Bouter, Tony Ross-Hellauer
exaly   +2 more sources

Open peer review? [PDF]

Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
Maíra Terra Garcia, Sigmar de Mello Rode   +1 more
doaj   +4 more sources

Multi-stage open peer review: scientific evaluation integrating the strengths of traditional peer review with the virtues of transparency and self-regulation

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012
The traditional forms of scientific publishing and peer review do not live up to the demands of efficient communication and quality assurance in today’s highly diverse and rapidly evolving world of science.
Ulrich ePöschl
doaj   +3 more sources

A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal [PDF]

PLoS ONE, 2020
Blair Hesp, Erin Peebles
exaly   +2 more sources

Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers [PDF]

PLoS ONE, 2017
Arvid Deppe, Birgit Schmidt, Tony Ross-Hellauer   +2 more
exaly   +2 more sources

Open Peer Review by a Selected-Papers Network [PDF]

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012
Christopher Lee
exaly   +2 more sources