Results 21 to 30 of about 2,234,202 (287)
Open peer review: some considerations on the selection and management of reviewers
JLIS.it, 2022 Open peer review (OPR) is a type of review that has long since made space alongside the more well-known single-blind and double-blind peer reviews. Despite this, we still do not have a shared definition by the scientific community and publishers.
Andrea Capaccioni
doaj +1 more source
Revealing Reviewers’ Identities as Part of Open Peer Review and Analysis of the Review Reports
Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries, 2020 This research article is aimed at comparing review reports, in which the identity of the reviewers is revealed to the authors of the papers, with those where the reviewers decided to remain anonymous.
Cezary Bolek +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2020 Background Our aim is to highlight the benefits and limitations of open and non-anonymized peer review. Our argument is based on the literature and on responses to a survey on the reviewing process of alt.chi, a more or less open review track within the ...
Lonni Besançon +4 more
doaj +1 more source
The Effect of Open Peer Review on Reviewers’ Behavior: a Scope Review [PDF]
Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management, 2023 The role of article publishing in academic and professional promotion is unprecedentedly increasing worldwide and researchers demand more transparency in the process of reviewing articles.
Nadia Hadji-Azizi
doaj +1 more source
An Open Science Peer Review Oath [PDF]
F1000Research, 2015 One of the foundations of the scientific method is to be able to reproduce experiments and corroborate the results of research that has been done before. However, with the increasing complexities of new technologies and techniques, coupled with the specialisation of experiments, reproducing research findings has become a growing challenge.
Jelena Aleksic +17 more
openaire +6 more sources
Automatically detecting open academic review praise and criticism [PDF]
, 2020 This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Emerald in Online Information Review on 15 June 2020. The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version, accessible at https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2019-0347.
Allen, Liz +4 more
core +1 more source
Moving peer review transparency from process to praxis
Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2019 Scholarly publications often work to provide transparency of peer-review processes, posting policy information to their websites as suggested by the Committee on Publication Ethics’ (COPE) 'Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Publishing'. Yet
Emily Ford
doaj +1 more source
Learning to share and sharing to learn – professionaldevelopment of language teachers in HE to foster open educational practices [PDF]
, 2013 This case study presents the staff-development perspective of the ‘Collaborative Writing and Peer Review Project’ developed at the Department of Languages, at the Open University, UK, between November 2011 and March 2012.
Duensing, Annette +2 more
core +1 more source
Opening Review in LIS Journals: A Status Report
Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2016 INTRODUCTION Peer-review practices in scholarly publishing are changing. Digital publishing mechanisms allow for open peer review, a peer review process that discloses author and reviewer identities to one another.
Emily Ford
doaj +2 more sources
Peer Review of the Evidence Base
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 2015 No abstract.
Lorie Kloda
doaj +1 more source