Results 21 to 30 of about 668,202 (287)
NANO, 2013 This article takes a moderate approach, balancing suggestions for when open peer review can benefit scholarship in the humanities, while offering important concerns authors and editors must consider before deciding to implement the process.
Jenna Pack Sheffield
doaj +2 more sources
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012 The traditional forms of scientific publishing and peer review do not live up to the demands of efficient communication and quality assurance in today’s highly diverse and rapidly evolving world of science.
Ulrich ePöschl
doaj +3 more sources
A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal [PDF]
PLoS ONE, 2020 Erin Peebles, Blair R Hesp
exaly +2 more sources
Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers [PDF]
PLoS ONE, 2017 Tony Ross-Hellauer +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Genetics, 2020 PEER review can be decidedly challenging—for authors who must absorb and respond to criticism of their work, for reviewers who invest their time uncompensated (and mostly unrecognized), and for editors who must sometimes make hard decisions on their fellow scientists’ work.
Tracey A, DePellegrin, Mark, Johnston
openaire +2 more sources
, 2018 Open peer review is a process by which to assess publications. Open peer review is a growing method in scholarly communication and can be placed in the context of open science. It is an alternative to common (double) blind review processes.
Editorial Board
core +5 more sources
Quality indicators for acute cardiovascular diseases: a scoping review
BMC Health Services Research, 2022 Background Although many quality indicator (QI) sets have been developed for acute cardiovascular diseases, a comprehensive summary is lacking. In this scoping review we aimed to summarize the available evidence on the QI sets for acute cardiovascular ...
Koshiro Kanaoka +6 more
doaj +1 more source
Reading Peer Review – What a dataset of peer review reports can teach us about changing research culture [PDF]
, 2021 One of the first megajournals, PLOS ONE, has played a significant role in changing scholarly communication and in particular peer review, by placing an emphasis on soundness, as opposed to novelty, in published research. Drawing on a study of peer review
Gadie, Robert +9 more
core +1 more source
Open science cannot succeed without open peer review
Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries, 2021 Open Science principles have been a critical driver for change in scholarly communication. Opening up research publications has led to encouraging rates of growth of Open Access but it has now become evident that true and system-wide change will only ...
Giannis Tsakonas
doaj +1 more source