Results 11 to 20 of about 668,202 (287)
What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations] [PDF]
F1000Research, 2017 Background: “Open peer review” (OPR), despite being a major pillar of Open Science, has neither a standardized definition nor an agreed schema of its features and implementations.
Tony Ross-Hellauer
doaj +7 more sources
Revista Latino-Americana de EnfermagemIntrodução: a avaliação por pares aberta é um elemento do ecossistema da ciência aberta que, apesar de sua crescente aceitação, ainda enfrenta resistência em comparação com o modelo tradicional de avaliação duplo-cega. Objetivo: apresentar os modelos de avaliação por pares aberta mais consolidados, seus benefícios e limitações, além das percepções de ...
Maíra Terra Garcia +1 more
doaj +10 more sources
Guidelines for open peer review implementation [PDF]
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2019 Open peer review (OPR) is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of researcher attitudes show important barriers to implementation.
Tony Ross-Hellauer, Edit Görögh
doaj +6 more sources
Maintaining Live Discussion in Two-Stage Open Peer Review [PDF]
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012 Open peer review has been proposed for a number of reasons, in particular, for increasing the transparency of the article selection process for a journal, and for obtaining a broader basis for feedback to the authors and for the acceptance decision.
Erik eSandewall, Erik eSandewall
doaj +4 more sources
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review [PDF]
Royal Society Open Science, 2016 Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability of data for theory-building and meta-analysis, and increased possibility of review and collaboration ...
Richard D Morey +2 more
exaly +14 more sources
Ten considerations for open peer review. [PDF]
F1000Res, 2018 Open peer review (OPR), as with other elements of open science and open research, is on the rise. It aims to bring greater transparency and participation to formal and informal peer review processes. But what is meant by `open peer review', and what advantages and disadvantages does it have over standard forms of review?
Schmidt B +3 more
europepmc +4 more sources
Possibilities for the peer review of interdisciplinary research: a small-scale qualitative study [PDF]
Research Integrity and Peer ReviewBackground Despite critiques from across academia, double-anonymised peer review is still considered the ‘gold standard’ quality-assurance tool for the publication of academic research. While some journals make use of ‘open’ peer-review practices to make
Georgia Vesma
doaj +2 more sources
Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5n1] [PDF]
F1000Research, 2015 Open peer review, peer review where authors' and reviewers' identities are disclosed to one another, is a growing trend in scholarly publishing. Through observation of four journals in STEM disciplines, PLOS One, Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, PeerJ ...
Emily Ford
doaj +2 more sources
Open peer review by a selected-papers network. [PDF]
Front Comput Neurosci, 2012 A selected-papers (SP) network is a network in which researchers who read, write, and review articles subscribe to each other based on common interests. Instead of reviewing a manuscript in secret for the Editor of a journal, each reviewer simply publishes his review (typically of a paper he wishes to recommend) to his SP network subscribers.
Lee C.
europepmc +5 more sources
Open peer review: pros and cons. [PDF]
Radiol Med, 2023 Sardanelli F, Colarieti A.
europepmc +3 more sources