Results 11 to 20 of about 2,234,202 (287)
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012 The traditional forms of scientific publishing and peer review do not live up to the demands of efficient communication and quality assurance in today’s highly diverse and rapidly evolving world of science.
Ulrich ePöschl
doaj +3 more sources
Genetics, 2020 PEER review can be decidedly challenging—for authors who must absorb and respond to criticism of their work, for reviewers who invest their time uncompensated (and mostly unrecognized), and for editors who must sometimes make hard decisions on their fellow scientists’ work.
Tracey A, DePellegrin, Mark, Johnston
openaire +3 more sources
Quality indicators for acute cardiovascular diseases: a scoping review
BMC Health Services Research, 2022 Background Although many quality indicator (QI) sets have been developed for acute cardiovascular diseases, a comprehensive summary is lacking. In this scoping review we aimed to summarize the available evidence on the QI sets for acute cardiovascular ...
Koshiro Kanaoka +6 more
doaj +1 more source
Open science cannot succeed without open peer review
Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries, 2021 Open Science principles have been a critical driver for change in scholarly communication. Opening up research publications has led to encouraging rates of growth of Open Access but it has now become evident that true and system-wide change will only ...
Giannis Tsakonas
doaj +1 more source
Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers. [PDF]
PLoS One, 2017 Ross-Hellauer T, Deppe A, Schmidt B.
europepmc +2 more sources
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review [PDF]
Royal Society Open Science, 2016 Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability of data for theory-building and meta-analysis, and increased possibility of review and collaboration ...
Richard D. Morey +12 more
openaire +13 more sources
Innovations in scholarly peer review at Nature Publishing Group and Palgrave Macmillan
Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2015 The peer-review system is one of the cornerstones of quality, integrity and reproducibility in research, and its existence has enabled the scholarly publishing system to function for hundreds of years.
Amy Bourke-Waite
doaj +1 more source
Development Trends of International Open Peer Review Platforms and Recommendations for China [PDF]
Nongye tushu qingbao xuebao[Purpose/Significance] This study systematically analyzes the basic models and development trends of international open peer review platforms, with the aim of exploring the insights these platforms provide for academic communication and research ...
ZHANG Zhixiong, WANG Yuju, ZHAO Yang
doaj +1 more source
Peer review and ‘openness’ [PDF]
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2009 The Editor states that publishing peer reviewers’ names is ‘a bold step in improving the transparency’ of the peer-review process, and is important in achieving a more open process.1 While one may respect Dr Abbassi's opinion in this regard, it appears to be an opinion held without objective supporting data.
openaire +2 more sources
Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries, 2010 The traditional forms of scientific publishing and peer review do not live up to the demands of efficient communication and quality assurance in today's highly diverse and rapidly evolving world of science.
Ulrich Poschl
doaj +1 more source