The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals [PDF]
Nature Communications, 2019 To increase transparency in science, some scholarly journals are publishing peer review reports. But it is unclear how this practice affects the peer review process.
Emilia Lopez-Inesta +2 more
exaly +3 more sources
Publishing peer review materials [version 1; referees: 2 approved] [PDF]
F1000Research, 2018 Publishing peer review materials alongside research articles promises to make the peer review process more transparent as well as making it easier to recognise these contributions and give credit to peer reviewers. Traditionally, the peer review reports,
Jeffrey Beck +18 more
doaj +3 more sources
Predatory publishing in management research: A call for open peer review
Management Learning, 2019 Predatory journals have emerged as an unintended consequence of the Open Access paradigm. Predatory journals only supposedly or very superficially conduct peer review and accept manuscripts within days to skim off publication fees.
Leonhard Dobusch +1 more
exaly +2 more sources
Is peer review in academic publishing still working?
Open Review of Educational Research, 2018 Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious practice, which can cause distress for both reviewers, and those whose work is reviewed. This paper, produced by the Editors’ Collective, examines the past and
Elizabeth Grierson +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?
Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2022 Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competent reviewers, it helps to safeguard the quality, validity, authority and rigour of academic work.
Faye Holst, Kim Eggleton, Simon Harris
doaj +1 more source
Publishing: Journals could share peer-review data
Nature, 2017 Ana Marusic +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review
Learned Publishing, 2023 Technology is being developed to support the peer review processes of journals, conferences, funders, universities, and national research evaluations. This literature and software summary discusses the partial or complete automation of several publishing‐
K. Kousha, M. Thelwall
semanticscholar +1 more source
Peer review in academic publishing: Challenges in achieving the gold standard
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2022 This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic publishing system. Peer review is a fundamental element of academic research and publishing, with a firm reliance on the global scholarly community to ...
Prue Gonzalez +2 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Scholarly publishing and peer review in the Global South: the role of the reviewer
JLIS.it, 2022 Peer review is an integral part of contemporary scholarly publishing, especially journal publishing. Work submitted by scholars from all parts of the world is subjected to it.
P. Lor
semanticscholar +1 more source
Accelerated Peer Review and Paper Processing Models in Academic Publishing
Publishing research quarterly, 2022 Some journals and publishers offer a free or paid rapid peer review service. In the latter case, such a service is offered at a premium, i.e., for an additional fee, and authors receive, in return, a privileged service, namely faster peer review.
J. A. Teixeira da Silva, Y. Yamada
semanticscholar +1 more source