Results 21 to 30 of about 22,542,366 (287)
Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000Research post-publication open peer review publishing model [PDF]
Journal of information science, 2019 As part of moves towards open knowledge practices, making peer review open is cited as a way to enable fuller scrutiny and transparency of assessments around research.
M. Thelwall +4 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
F1000Research, 2015 Peer review is the "gold standard" for evaluating journal and conference papers, research proposals, on-going projects and university departments. However, it is widely believed that current systems are expensive, conservative and prone to various forms ...
Richard Walker +4 more
doaj +1 more source
A Critical Examination of the Ethics of AI-Mediated Peer Review [PDF]
arXiv.org, 2023 Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) systems, including large language models like ChatGPT, offer promise and peril for scholarly peer review. On the one hand, AI can enhance efficiency by addressing issues like long publication delays. On
L. Schintler, C. McNeely, J. Witte
semanticscholar +1 more source
F1000Research, 2016 Background Publishing in scientific journals is one of the most important ways in which scientists disseminate research to their peers and to the wider public.
Marco Giordan +3 more
doaj +1 more source
F1000Research, 2015 Open peer review, peer review where authors' and reviewers' identities are disclosed to one another, is a growing trend in scholarly publishing. Through observation of four journals in STEM disciplines, PLOS One, Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, PeerJ ...
Emily Ford
doaj +1 more source
Scientific Publishing: 2. Peer Review
, 2022 This is the second of a five-lecture Seminar on Scientific Publishing, presented by Manolis Antonoyiannakis at Columbia University (sponsored by IGERT Quantum Optics) in 2016-2017.
Antonoyiannakis, Manolis
core +1 more source
F1000Research, 2017 Researchers give papers for free (and often actually pay) to exploitative publishers who make millions off of our articles by locking them behind paywalls.
Corina J Logan
doaj +1 more source
High Yield Medical Reviews: The inauguration of new journal
High Yield Medical Reviews, 2023 I am glad to announce the inauguration of High Yield Medical Reviews (HYMR), an international, peer-reviewed journal that aims to connect researchers’ work with practicing physician’s needs, filling the gap between research output and physician needs.
Abdee Ryalat
doaj +1 more source
F1000Research, 2016 The time it takes for a completed manuscript to be published traditionally can be extremely lengthy. Article publication delay, which occurs in part due to constraints associated with peer review, can prevent the timely dissemination of critical and ...
Carrie L. Iwema +3 more
doaj +1 more source
What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences? [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
F1000Research, 2018 Background: Peer review decisions award an estimated >95% of academic medical research funding, so it is crucial to understand how well they work and if they could be improved.
Susan Guthrie +2 more
doaj +1 more source