Results 11 to 20 of about 22,542,366 (287)
Reading Peer Review – What a dataset of peer review reports can teach us about changing research culture [PDF]
, 2021 One of the first megajournals, PLOS ONE, has played a significant role in changing scholarly communication and in particular peer review, by placing an emphasis on soundness, as opposed to novelty, in published research. Drawing on a study of peer review
Gadie, Robert +9 more
core +1 more source
Reading Peer Review: PLOS ONE and Institutional Change in Academia [PDF]
, 2021 Co-authored book. Eve, M., Neylon, C., O’Donnell, D., Moore, S., Gadie, P., Odeniyi, V. & Parvin, S.(2021). Reading Peer Review,PLOS One and institutional change, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gadie, Robert +6 more
core +4 more sources
Utilization and Effects of Peer‐Assisted Learning in Basic Medical Education [PDF]
, 2021 This review of the literature explored the experiences and effects of peer-assisted learning in basic medical education. Peer-assisted learning is most commonly utilized to teach clinical skills (including technical skills) and medical knowledge (76.4%).
Korean Medical Education Review (의학교육논단)
core +1 more source
Opening Review in LIS Journals: A Status Report
Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2016 INTRODUCTION Peer-review practices in scholarly publishing are changing. Digital publishing mechanisms allow for open peer review, a peer review process that discloses author and reviewer identities to one another.
Emily Ford
doaj +2 more sources
F1000Research, 2017 Scientific irreproducibility is a major issue that has recently increased attention from publishers, authors, funders and other players in the scientific arena. Published literature suggests that 50-80% of all science performed is irreproducible. While
Clare Fiala, Eleftherios P. Diamandis
doaj +1 more source
F1000Research, 2017 Increasingly, preprints are at the center of conversations across the research ecosystem. But disagreements remain about the role they play. Do they “count” for research assessment? Is it ok to post preprints in more than one place?
Cameron Neylon +3 more
doaj +1 more source
New frontiers of peer review [PDF]
, 2016 This news article introduces a new COST Action entitled PEERE (TD1306), which stands for New Frontiers of Peer Review (PEERE). PEERE is a trans-domain proposal which brings together researchers from various different disciplines and science stake ...
Franzoni, Chiara +7 more
core +1 more source
F1000Research, 2018 Background: Sweden is viewed as an egalitarian country, still most of the professors are Swedish and only 25% are women. Research competence is evaluated using peer review, which is regarded as an objective measure in the meritocracy system.
Sarah Holst, Sara Hägg
doaj +1 more source
, 2016 The report considers the diverse range of practices that constitute peer review in both publishing and institutional structures, examining the history of peer review, and evaluating how innovative alternative models aim to resolve pressures on the ...
Squires, Claire +5 more
core +1 more source
F1000Research, 2013 I compare two possible extreme hypotheses regarding submission of papers to journals: the Q hypothesis, whereby the decision to submit is based on quality of research; and the P hypothesis, whereby it is based on probability of acceptance.
Stephen Senn
doaj +1 more source