Results 31 to 40 of about 22,542,366 (287)
Peer Review of Manuscripts: An Online Training Module
MedEdPORTAL, 2013 This resource is an online training module designed to develop and improve the skills of manuscript reviewers. The module includes discussions on the importance, history, and process of peer review; an overview of the uniform requirements for manuscripts
Latha Chandran, Virginia Niebuhr
doaj +1 more source
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 2023 Peer review is an important part of the scientific publishing process that serves as a key quality control step. Learning that scientific publications go through peer review builds scientific literacy and may increase trust in published findings.
Rachael M. Barry
doaj +1 more source
Scholarly Publishing, Peer Review and the Internet
First Monday, 1999 The Internet is arguably one of the most significant technological developments of the late 20th century. From its modest beginnings some decades ago - where the use of networked computers was largely limited to to a select group of technical specialists
P. Roberts
semanticscholar +1 more source
Clinics and Practice, 2023 The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has greatly propelled progress across various sectors including the field of nephrology academia. However, this advancement has also given rise to ethical challenges, notably in scholarly writing.
Jing Miao +5 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
The Open Science Peer Review Oath [PDF]
, 2014 One of the foundations of the scientific method is to be able to reproduce experiments and corroborate the results of research that has been done before.
Förstner, Konrad +18 more
core +1 more source
F1000Research, 2018 Background: Evaluating applications for multi-national, multi-disciplinary, dual-purpose research consortia is highly complex. There has been little research on the peer review process for evaluating grant applications and almost none on how applications
Stefanie Gregorius +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Scientific publishing: Peer review, unmasked
Nature, 2002 The editorial review of scientific papers usually takes place behind closed doors, but could the process be improved by opening it up for all to see? Trisha Gura investigates.
T. Gura
semanticscholar +1 more source
, 2012 PEER (Publishing and the Ecology of European Research), supported by the EC eContentplus programme, has been investigating the potential effects of the large-scale, systematic depositing of authors' final peer-reviewed manuscripts (so called Green Open ...
Wallace, Julia
core +2 more sources
F1000Research, 2015 The aim of this paper is to understand whether the probability of receiving positive peer reviews is influenced by having published in an independently assessed, high-ranking journal: we eventually interpret a positive relationship among peer evaluation ...
Andrea Bonaccorsi +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Roles and Responsibilities for Peer Reviewers of International Journals
Publications, 2023 There is a noticeable paucity of recently published research on the roles and responsibilities of peer reviewers for international journals. Concurrently, the pool of these peer reviewers is decreasing.
Carol Nash
doaj +1 more source