Results 51 to 60 of about 22,542,366 (287)

Program Chairs’ Report on Peer Review at ACL 2023

Volume 1, 2023
We present a summary of the efforts to improve conference peer review that were implemented at ACL’23. This includes work with the goal of improving review quality, clearer workflow and decision support for the area chairs, as well as our efforts to ...
A. Rogers, Marzena Karpinska, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, N. Okazaki   +3 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

European Standard Clinical Practice Guideline and EXPeRT Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Children and Adolescents

Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Pediatric gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP‐NENs) are extremely rare and clinically heterogeneous. Management has largely been extrapolated from adult practice. This European Standard Clinical Practice Guideline (ESCP), developed by the EXPeRT network in collaboration with adult NEN experts, provides (adult) evidence ...
Michaela Kuhlen, Calogero Virgone, Antje Redlich, Michael Abele, Ricardo Lopez‐Almaraz, Tal Ben‐Ami, Ewa Bien, Gianni Bisogno, Maja Mazic Cesen, Andrea Ferrari, Malgorzata A. Krawczyk, Yves Reguerre, Dominik T. Schneider, Ines B. Brecht, Charlotte Rigaud, Bilgehan Yalcin, Rainer Claus, Christian Vokuhl, Constantin Lapa, Jörg Fuchs, Segolene Hescot, Thomas Walter, Julien Hadoux, Daniel Orbach   +23 more
wiley   +1 more source

Governing the Game-Changer: Reimagining Peer Review in the Age of AI

Trends in Scholarly Publishing
The peer review system, long regarded as the cornerstone of scholarly publishing, is facing unprecedented strain. Rising submission volumes, reviewer fatigue, and increasing instances of research misconduct have revealed deep structural vulnerabilities ...
Lucy Threadgold, Hong Zhou, Simone Ragavooloo, Daniel Stuckey, Maryam Sayab   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Misunderstanding publication bias: editors are not blameless after all [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/YvAwwD]

F1000Research, 2012
In analysing whether there is an editorial bias in favour of positive studies, researchers have made implicit assumptions that are implausible. In particular, to justify the conclusion that there is no bias because observed editorial acceptance rates do ...
Stephen Senn
doaj   +1 more source

Defining quality in peer review reports: a scoping review

Knowledge and Information Systems
This study examines the challenge of defining quality in peer-review reports, a crucial yet underexplored aspect of academic publishing. Reviewers are vital gatekeepers of scientific knowledge, but unclear skills and a lack of standardized guidelines ...
Amanda Sizo, Adriano Lino, Á. Rocha, Luís Paulo Reis   +3 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling

Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2023
Background There are a variety of costs associated with publication of scientific findings. The purpose of this work was to estimate the cost of peer review in scientific publishing per reviewer, per year and for the entire scientific community.
A. LeBlanc, J. Barnes, T. Saunders, M. Tremblay, J. Chaput   +4 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas in Children and Adolescents: Expert Recommendations

Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPN) is a rare low‐grade malignant exocrine pancreatic tumor, mostly discovered during the second decade of life in females, with a very good prognosis, provided microscopically complete surgical excision is achieved.
Sabine Irtan, Michael Abele, Calogero Virgone, Michaela Kuhlen, Ricardo Lopez‐Almarez, Tal Ben‐Ami, Ewa Bien, Maja Cesen, Malgorzata A. Krawczyk, Andrea Ferrari, Gianni Bisogno, Yves Reguerre, Dominik T. Schneider, Louise Galmiche, Jorg Fuchs, Sarah Braungart, Bilgehan Yalcin, Ines B. Brecht, Daniel Orbach   +18 more
wiley   +1 more source

Professional medical writing support and the reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals [version 2; referees: 2 approved]

F1000Research, 2017
Background: In articles reporting randomized controlled trials, professional medical writing support is associated with increased adherence to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT).
Ira Mills, Catherine Sheard, Meredith Hays, Kevin Douglas, Christopher C. Winchester, William T. Gattrell   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

A Cross‐Disciplinary Analysis of AI Policies in Academic Peer Review

Learned Publishing
Rapid advances of artificial intelligence (AI) have substantially impacted the field of academic publishing. This study examines AI integration in peer review by analysing policies from 439 high‐ and 363 middle‐impact factor (IF) journals across ...
Zhong-Shi Wang, Meng-Yue Gong
semanticscholar   +1 more source

The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary

The Pan African Medical Journal, 2019
Scholarly publication in a peer-reviewed journal is the highest form of disseminating research findings. However, the process of publishing in peer-reviewed journals remains a daunting task for researchers and academics in Africa.
E. Tarkang, L. Bain
semanticscholar   +1 more source