Results 41 to 50 of about 22,542,366 (287)

Peer review innovations in Humanities: how can scholars in A&H profit of the "wisdom of the crowds"? [PDF]

, 2010
Though supported by a large number of scholars in Scientific, Technical, and Medical (STM) disciplines traditional peer review does not live up to the needs of an efficient scholarly communication system and of quality research control.
Cassella, Maria
core   +1 more source

Biased under-reporting of research reflects biased under-submission more than biased editorial rejection [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/ViIqTX]

F1000Research, 2013
Stephen Senn challenges Ben Goldacre’s assertion in ‘Bad Pharma’ that biased editorial acceptance of reports with ‘positive’ findings is not a cause of biased under-reporting of research.
Iain Chalmers, Kay Dickersin
doaj   +1 more source

How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought

Learned Publishing, 2023
Peer review plays an essential role as one of the cornerstones of the scholarly publishing system. There are many initiatives that aim to improve the way in which peer review is organized, resulting in a highly complex landscape of innovation in peer ...
L. Waltman, W. Kaltenbrunner, S. Pinfield, H. B. Woods   +3 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review [version 3; referees: 2 approved]

F1000Research, 2017
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of its importance, the status and purpose of peer review is often contested. What is its role in our modern digital research and communications infrastructure?
Jonathan P. Tennant, Jonathan M. Dugan, Daniel Graziotin, Damien C. Jacques, François Waldner, Daniel Mietchen, Yehia Elkhatib, Lauren B. Collister, Christina K. Pikas, Tom Crick, Paola Masuzzo, Anthony Caravaggi, Devin R. Berg, Kyle E. Niemeyer, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Sara Mannheimer, Lillian Rigling, Daniel S. Katz, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza, Nazeefa Fatima, Marta Poblet, Marios Isaakidis, Dasapta Erwin Irawan, Sébastien Renaut, Christopher R. Madan, Lisa Matthias, Jesper Nørgaard Kjær, Daniel Paul O'Donnell, Cameron Neylon, Sarah Kearns, Manojkumar Selvaraju, Julien Colomb   +32 more
doaj   +1 more source

Death of a reviewer or death of peer review integrity? the challenges of using AI tools in peer reviewing and the need to go beyond publishing policies

Research Ethics
Peer review facilitates quality control and integrity of scientific research. Although publishing policies have adapted to include the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, such as Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), in the ...
V. Mollaki
semanticscholar   +1 more source

The peer review process for awarding funds to international science research consortia: a qualitative developmental evaluation [version 2; referees: 2 approved]

F1000Research, 2017
Background: Evaluating applications for multi-national, multi-disciplinary, dual-purpose research consortia is highly complex. There has been little research on the peer review process for evaluating grant applications and almost none on how applications
Stefanie Gregorius, Laura Dean, Donald C Cole, Imelda Bates   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review: Enhancing Efficiency While Preserving Integrity

Journal of Korean medical science
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed various aspects of scientific research, including academic publishing and peer review.
B. Doskaliuk, O. Zimba, M. Yessirkepov, I. Klishch, R. Yatsyshyn   +4 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

“Questionable” peer review in the publishing pandemic during the time of COVID-19: implications for policy makers and stakeholders

Croatian Medical Journal, 2020
Indeed, the urgency to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic and expand international collaboration has created the need to make scientific studies immediately available through PubMed Central and other sources such as the World Health Organization’s Covid ...
Francesco Chirico, J. A. Teixeira da Silva, N. Magnavita   +2 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

We can shift academic culture through publishing choices [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]

F1000Research, 2017
Researchers give papers for free (and often actually pay) to exploitative publishers who make millions off of our articles by locking them behind paywalls.
Corina J Logan
doaj   +1 more source

A citation-based, author- and age-normalized, logarithmic index for evaluation of individual researchers independently of publication counts [version 1; referees: 2 approved]

F1000Research, 2015
The use of citation metrics for evaluation of individual researchers has dramatically increased over the last decade. However, currently existing indices either are based on misleading premises or are cumbersome to implement.
Aleksey V. Belikov, Vitaly V. Belikov
doaj   +1 more source