Results 1 to 10 of about 1,857,257 (288)
Peer review seems to have had its origins in 18th century England to combat plagiarism. But today, the objectives of peer review are to provide evaluations of the quality of scientific or editorial material submitted. Peer review provides a check on the validity of manuscripts and sets standards for scientific merit.
Robert P. Ferguson, Stephanie M. Griffin
openaire +6 more sources
Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?
Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competent reviewers, it helps to safeguard the quality, validity, authority and rigour of academic work.
Faye Holst, Kim Eggleton, Simon Harris
doaj +1 more source
Background Although previous studies have reported general inexperience with the Epley manoeuvre (EM) among general physicians, no report has evaluated the effect of EM on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) in primary care by using point ...
Yusuke Saishoji +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Background Differential participation and success in grant applications may contribute to women’s lesser representation in the sciences. This study’s objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to address the question of gender ...
Karen B. Schmaling, Stephen A. Gallo
doaj +1 more source
Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion
Background Funding agencies have long used panel discussion in the peer review of research grant proposals as a way to utilize a set of expertise and perspectives in making funding decisions.
Stephen A. Gallo +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Background While conducting systemic reviews, searching for ongoing or unpublished trials is critical to address publication bias. As of April 2019, records of ongoing or unpublished randomized and/or quasi-randomized controlled trials registered in the ...
Masahiro Banno +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Compared with western medicine with objective and standardized theories, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) places more emphasis on subjective thinking.
Liu Da-Hua, Cao Shu-Hua
doaj +1 more source
Background Research engagement contributes to the improvement of patient care. A systematic review is a suitable first scholarly activity because it entails summarization of publicly available data and usually requires neither rigorous ethical review nor
Hiraku Tsujimoto +19 more
doaj +1 more source
Association Between Drinking of Different Types of Tea and Risk of Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [PDF]
Background and aims: Cerebrovascular accidents, commonly known as stroke, are among the leading causes of disability and death worldwide. As the second most consumed beverage globally, tea has attracted research interest regarding its potential role in ...
Moloud Fakhri +5 more
doaj +1 more source
Quality indicators for acute cardiovascular diseases: a scoping review
Background Although many quality indicator (QI) sets have been developed for acute cardiovascular diseases, a comprehensive summary is lacking. In this scoping review we aimed to summarize the available evidence on the QI sets for acute cardiovascular ...
Koshiro Kanaoka +6 more
doaj +1 more source

