Results 11 to 20 of about 6,786,733 (300)
Reading Peer Review – What a dataset of peer review reports can teach us about changing research culture [PDF]
, 2021 One of the first megajournals, PLOS ONE, has played a significant role in changing scholarly communication and in particular peer review, by placing an emphasis on soundness, as opposed to novelty, in published research. Drawing on a study of peer review
Gadie, Robert +9 more
core +1 more source
Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?
Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2022 Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competent reviewers, it helps to safeguard the quality, validity, authority and rigour of academic work.
Faye Holst, Kim Eggleton, Simon Harris
doaj +1 more source
Utilization and Effects of Peer‐Assisted Learning in Basic Medical Education [PDF]
, 2021 This review of the literature explored the experiences and effects of peer-assisted learning in basic medical education. Peer-assisted learning is most commonly utilized to teach clinical skills (including technical skills) and medical knowledge (76.4%).
Korean Medical Education Review (의학교육논단)
core +1 more source
BMC Primary Care, 2023 Background Although previous studies have reported general inexperience with the Epley manoeuvre (EM) among general physicians, no report has evaluated the effect of EM on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) in primary care by using point ...
Yusuke Saishoji +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2023 Background Differential participation and success in grant applications may contribute to women’s lesser representation in the sciences. This study’s objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to address the question of gender ...
Karen B. Schmaling, Stephen A. Gallo
doaj +1 more source
Peer‐review for the peer‐review system [PDF]
human_ontogenetics, 2009 AbstractThe process of peer‐review of papers submitted for publication and of grant proposals is widely accepted in modern science as a crucial guarantee of high‐quality work. Foremost in restricted research areas, anonymous reviewers and editors may use their power to slow down or even reject competitive yet worthwhile work that does not fit or is ...
Rühli, F. +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2020 Background Funding agencies have long used panel discussion in the peer review of research grant proposals as a way to utilize a set of expertise and perspectives in making funding decisions.
Stephen A. Gallo +3 more
doaj +1 more source
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2020 Background While conducting systemic reviews, searching for ongoing or unpublished trials is critical to address publication bias. As of April 2019, records of ongoing or unpublished randomized and/or quasi-randomized controlled trials registered in the ...
Masahiro Banno +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Digital Chinese Medicine, 2020 Compared with western medicine with objective and standardized theories, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) places more emphasis on subjective thinking.
Liu Da-Hua, Cao Shu-Hua
doaj +1 more source
BMC Medical Education, 2021 Background Research engagement contributes to the improvement of patient care. A systematic review is a suitable first scholarly activity because it entails summarization of publicly available data and usually requires neither rigorous ethical review nor
Hiraku Tsujimoto +19 more
doaj +1 more source