Results 11 to 20 of about 58,740,720 (292)

The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review [PDF]

Royal Society Open Science, 2016
Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability ...
Richard D. Morey, Christopher D. Chambers, Peter J. Etchells, Christine R. Harris, Rink Hoekstra, Daniël Lakens, Stephan Lewandowsky, Candice Coker Morey, Daniel P. Newman, Felix D. Schönbrodt, Wolf Vanpaemel, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Rolf A. Zwaan   +12 more
doaj   +16 more sources

Reading Peer Review – What a dataset of peer review reports can teach us about changing research culture [PDF]

, 2021
One of the first megajournals, PLOS ONE, has played a significant role in changing scholarly communication and in particular peer review, by placing an emphasis on soundness, as opposed to novelty, in published research. Drawing on a study of peer review
Gadie, Robert, Odeniyi, Victoria, Moore, Samuel, O'Donnell, Daniel Paul, O'Donnell, Daniel, Eve, Martin, Martin, Eve, Eve, Martin Paul, Neylon, Cameron, Parvin, Shahina   +9 more
core   +6 more sources

Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?

Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2022
Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competent reviewers, it helps to safeguard the quality, validity, authority and rigour of academic work.
Faye Holst, Kim Eggleton, Simon Harris
doaj   +1 more source

Peer-review of the research flow

, 2017
An increasing number of researchers use ICT tools for the production and processing of research outcomes. In the last decade, research infrastructures (organizational and technological facilities supporting research activities) are investing in "e-infrastructures" that leverage ICT tools, services, guidelines and policies to support the digital ...
Bardi A, Casarosa V, Manghi P
openaire   +3 more sources

Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences at a Glance: The Past and Present [PDF]

Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences, 2023
After more than 50 years of its birth, the Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences (IJMS), formerly known as Pahlavi Medical Journal, is now regarded as a reputable, regularly published medical journal in the region.
Mohammad Reza Panjehshahin
doaj   +1 more source

Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers

Rheumatology, 2021
The peer review process is essential for quality checks and validation of journal submissions. Although it has some limitations, including manipulations and biased and unfair evaluations, there is no other alternative to the system. Several peer review models are now practised, with public review being the most appropriate in view of the open science ...
Olena Zimba, Armen Gasparyan
openaire   +3 more sources

The Assessment of Research Quality: Peer Review or Metrics? [PDF]

, 2009
This paper investigates the extent to which the outcomes of the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise, determined by peer review, can be explained by a set of quantitative indicators, some of which were made available to the review panels.
Taylor, J
core   +4 more sources

A model six-month workshop for developing systematic review protocols at teaching hospitals: action research and scholarly productivity

BMC Medical Education, 2021
Background Research engagement contributes to the improvement of patient care. A systematic review is a suitable first scholarly activity because it entails summarization of publicly available data and usually requires neither rigorous ethical review nor
Hiraku Tsujimoto, Yuki Kataoka, Yukihito Sato, Masahiro Banno, Emi Tsujino-Tsujimoto, Yukiyoshi Sumi, Ryuichi Sada, Takashi Fujiwara, Yoichi Ohtake, Junji Kumasawa, Haruki Imura, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Ryuhei So, Tomoko Kagawa, Takashi Yoshioka, Yu Uneno, Hiroyuki Nagano, Mai Akazawa, Takunori Hozumi, Yasushi Tsujimoto   +19 more
doaj   +1 more source

What You Need to Keep in Mind While Peer Reviewing a Medical Research Paper

Trends in Scholarly Publishing, 2023
Medical peer reviewing is a crucial component for ensuring the high quality of the research publications. Therefore, it follows that a peer reviewer should know his job inside out. There are key aspects of the peer-reviewing process that needs to be kept
Mrinmay Dhauria, Kaushik Bharati
doaj   +1 more source

Association Between Drinking of Different Types of Tea and Risk of Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [PDF]

Epidemiology and Health System Journal
Background and aims: Cerebrovascular accidents, commonly known as stroke, are among the leading causes of disability and death worldwide. As the second most consumed beverage globally, tea has attracted research interest regarding its potential role in ...
Moloud Fakhri, Ali Hasanpour Dehkordi, Diana Sarokhani, Mohsen Abdan, Mahdieh Ahmadnia, Tayebe Jamshidbeigi   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source