Results 251 to 260 of about 4,903,274 (294)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Double-double effect and the coordination number
Journal of Radioanalytical Chemistry, 1979The thermodynamics of protonation of the lanthanide(III) chelates of trans-l,2-diaminocyclohexanetetraacetic acid (LnDCTA') was studied by potentiometric titration at the ionic strength of 1 (KC1). The protonation constants determined change monotonically and the double-double effect in the log K against Z variation is manifested in all four segments ...
openaire +2 more sources
Euthanasia, double effect, and proportionality
Monash Bioethics Review, 2002I discuss the Principle of Double Effect (PDE) as a means of exploring aspects of the motivation of active voluntary euthanasia (a.v.e). It is argued that the objective of a.v.e. is not death but the relief of suffering. Nor is death the means, it is a concomitant. I entertain no hope of convincing the typical proponent of PDE that a.v.e.
openaire +2 more sources
Double effect, double intention, and asymmetric warfare
Journal of Military Ethics, 2004Modern warfare cannot be conducted without civilians being killed. In order to reconcile this fact with the principle of discrimination in just war theory, the principle is applied through the doctrine of double effect. But this doctrine is morally inadequate because it is too permissive regarding the risk to civilians.
openaire +1 more source
Double effect, double bind or double speak?
Palliative Medicine, 1999James Gilbert, Stephen Kirkham
openaire +1 more source
Who is Entitled to Double Effect?
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1991The doctrine of double effect continues to be an important tool in bioethical casuistry. Its role within the Catholic moral tradition continues, and there is considerable interest in it by contemporary moral philosophers. But problems of justification and correct application remain.
openaire +2 more sources
Double Effect and Double Intention: A Collectivist Perspective
Israel Law Review, 2007I find myself in agreement with much of Jeff McMahan's analysis. Yet I have argued in the past (initially against Judith Jarvis Thomson, but also against McMahan) that it is insufficient, and misleading, to think about warfare and its moral assessment in merely individualistic terms.
openaire +1 more source
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2011
In this new book Moral Dimensions, T. M. Scanlon (2008) explores the ethical significance of the intentions and motives with which people act. According to Scanlon, these intentions and motives do not have any direct bearing on the permissibility of the act. Thus, Scanlon claims that the traditional Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) is mistaken. However,
openaire +1 more source
In this new book Moral Dimensions, T. M. Scanlon (2008) explores the ethical significance of the intentions and motives with which people act. According to Scanlon, these intentions and motives do not have any direct bearing on the permissibility of the act. Thus, Scanlon claims that the traditional Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) is mistaken. However,
openaire +1 more source

