Results 261 to 270 of about 214,168 (304)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Possession and the double object construction
Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 2002This paper argues that double-object verbs decompose into two heads, an external-argumentselecting CAUSE predicate (vCAUSE) and a prepositional element, PHAVE. Two primary types of argument are presented. First, a consideration of the well-known Oerhle’s generalization effects in English motivate such a decomposition, in combination with a ...
Heidi Harley
exaly +3 more sources
On the Double Object Construction and the Oblique Construction in Cantonese
The double-object construction has always been a controversial issue in linguistic theory. In Chinese we encounter an interesting and peculiar situation: both Mandarin and Cantonese have the dative construction with the indirect object (IO) introduced by a dative preposition (V + DO + Prep. + IO), but when the preposition is absent, the indirect object
Xu Liejiong, Alain Peyraube
semanticscholar +3 more sources
The double-object construction, domain asymmetries, and linear precedence
The behavior of domain-sensitive phenomena in the double-object construction in English has been a topic of controversy. On the basis of this behavior and other facts about the double-object construction Larson (1988) offered an analysis of that ...
D. Napoli
exaly +4 more sources
The Double Object Construction in Danish
Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1986M. Herslund
exaly +3 more sources
On the Emergence of the Inverted Double Object Construction in Hakka
Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2020透過歷時和跨方言的語料檢視,本文旨在探討客家話倒置雙賓式的起源。巴色會文獻中的「俾/畀/奔」之用法顯現了單及物持拿義動詞的特點,本文由此出發,提出幾項證據,證明倒置雙賓式源自於介賓補語式的介詞省略,省略的動因是構式義和介詞義之間的語意冗餘,而非如文獻中所言,肇因於同音刪略或因介賓補語式高頻使用而刪略,此外,為促使此結構的產生,此結構中的動詞之類型頻率必須維持在低頻,以便達到較高的語意連貫性,這個觀點可以解釋為何出現在倒置雙賓式中的動詞普遍來說都遠不如介賓補語式來得豐富和多樣。
Jui-chuan Yeh
openaire +2 more sources
Cantonese give and Double-Object Construction
Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 2022GIVE is a versatile morpheme in many languages. While there have been extensive studies on the interplay between the syntax and semantics of GIVE in many languages, not much has been done in a similar manner on Cantonese, a member of the Yue dialect group of the Chinese language family.
A. C. Chin
openaire +2 more sources
THE DOUBLE OBJECT CONSTRUCTION IN WEST FLEMISH
Linguistic Review, 1986Liliane Haegeman
exaly +3 more sources
The double object constructions in Archaic Chinese*
This article demonstrates that double object constructions in Archaic Chinese display both patterns of direct and indirect object marking (DO+IO) and primary and secondary object marking (PO+SO). We propose two constraints to account for the grammatical distribution of GIVE verbs in the double object construction with PO+SO marking in Archaic Chinese.
Chiew Pheng PHUA, PHUA Chiew Pheng
openaire +2 more sources
The Double Object Construction in Chinese
Monumenta Serica, 1977(1977). The Double Object Construction in Chinese. Monumenta Serica: Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 268-285.
M. Hashimoto
openaire +2 more sources

