Further evidence for coadaptation in crosses between geographic populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura [PDF]
, 1968 Wyatt W. Anderson
openalex +1 more source
GENETIC LOADS AFFECTING FECUNDITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA [PDF]
, 1967 Dragoslav Marinković
openalex +1 more source
GENETICS OF NATURAL POPULATIONS. XXXVII. THE COADAPTED SYSTEM OF CHROMOSOMAL VARIANTS IN A POPULATION OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA [PDF]
, 1966 Olga Pavlovsky, Th. Dobzhansky
openalex +1 more source
Frequency dependence of mating success inDrosophila pseudoobscura [PDF]
, 1968 Lee Ehrman
openalex +1 more source
Responses of Various Strains of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis to Light and to Gravity [PDF]
, 1967 B Spassky
openalex +1 more source
Tissue- and stage-dependent dosage compensation on the neo-X chromosome in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
Molecular biology and evolution, 2014 M. Nozawa +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Morphological Variation in Natural and Experimental Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis [PDF]
, 1966 Alexander Sokoloff
openalex +1 more source
GENETICS OF NATURAL POPULATIONS. XXXV. A PROGRESS REPORT ON GENETIC CHANGES IN POPULATIONS OFDROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURAIN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST [PDF]
, 1964 Th. Dobzhansky +4 more
openalex +1 more source
Mating Choice in Crosses between Geographic Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura [PDF]
, 1969 Wyatt W. Anderson, Lee Ehrman
openalex +1 more source
Acta Biológica Colombiana, 2001 Drosophila pseudoobscuraha sido uno de los modelos biológicos que ha servido al estudio de laespeciación dada su distribución geográfica (Dobzhansky & Epling, 1944, Dobzhansky et al.,1963). Se estudiaron once poblaciones con 14 marcadores microsatélites.
D. Álvarez, M. Ruíz-García
doaj