Results 261 to 270 of about 356,850 (303)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

A comparison of DSM-III and DSM-III-R schizophrenia

American Journal of Psychiatry, 1988
The authors compared DSM-III and DSM-III-R definitions of schizophrenia among 532 inpatients treated in a long-term residential setting and reevaluated an average of 15 years later. Largely by excluding those with nonbizarre delusions (somatic, grandiose, or religious) without hallucinations, DSM-III-R reduced the number of patients diagnosed with ...
W S, Fenton   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Melancholia: from DSM-III to DSM-III-R

American Journal of Psychiatry, 1989
On July 26, 1985, an ad hoc committee appointed by the APA Work Group to Revise DSM-III met and reviewed the research on the validity of the DSM-III criteria for melancholia. In this paper the proceedings of the meeting are related. After reviewing studies of the validity of the DSM-III melancholia criteria, the authors describe the committee's ...
M, Zimmerman, R L, Spitzer
openaire   +2 more sources

From DSM-IV to DSM-5

Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 2013
This article reviews the modifications to eating disorders that appear in the 'Feeding and Eating Disorders' chapter of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). These modifications include the addition of three disorders (avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, rumination disorder, and pica) previously ...
Christine, Call   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

An Introduction to DSM-IV

Psychiatric Services, 1990
With this column, the task force on DSM-IV begins the first ofa series of columns on issues in the development of the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM-IV, which is scheduled for publication in 1993. The purpose ofthe column is to encourage the widest possible participation in the development of DSM-IV.
A, Frances   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

What is Wrong with the DSM? [PDF]

open access: possibleHistory of Psychiatry, 2004
The DSM is the main classification of mental disorders used by psychiatrists in the United States and, increasingly, around the world. Although widely used, the DSM has come in for fierce criticism, with many commentators believing it to be conceptually flawed in a variety of ways. This paper assesses some of these philosophical worries. The first half
openaire   +1 more source

Paraphilias in the DSM-5

Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2016
This review summarizes and critically examines the changes in how the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) characterizes paraphilias. Attention is paid to the diagnostic options that were included in DSM-5, the decision not to include criterion sets for two additional disorders (paraphilic coercive disorder and hypersexual ...
Anthony R, Beech   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Classification of Mood Disorders in DSM-V and DSM-VI

Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2008
For any diagnostic system to be clinically useful, and go beyond description, it must provide an understanding that informs about aetiology and/or outcome. DSM-III and DSM-IV have provided reliability; the challenge for DSM-V and DSM-VI will be to provide validity. For DSM-V this will not be achieved.
openaire   +2 more sources

Predicting the DSM-V

The Journal of Nervous &amp Mental Disease, 1996
Using regression estimates based upon data about past editions of the DSM, we predict various features of the DSM-V. Included in these predictions are the date of publication, number of pages, total number of categories, number of categories defined using diagnostic criteria, total number of diagnostic criteria, color of the manual, who will be in ...
R K, Blashfield, A K, Fuller
openaire   +2 more sources

From DSM-III-R to DSM-IV

Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1990
David Shaffer, Fred Volkmar
  +5 more sources

DSM-III and DSM-III-R-Reply

Archives of General Psychiatry, 1989
In Reply.— Dr Swartz is right. We recognize the talmudic nature of the interaction over diagnosis. I think we can say with little fear of contradiction that when research demands this kind of behavior, we will not be discovering how to split the atom or find the gene.
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy