Dynamic hip screw versus proximal femoral nailing in stable intertrochanteric fractures: a systematic review of efficacy and outcomes. [PDF]
Stable intertrochanteric fractures of the hip are common injuries, particularly among the elderly population. Effective surgical intervention is crucial for improving patient outcomes and recovery.
Musa AHM +7 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation versus Multiple Screw Fixation for Intracapsular Hip Fracture [PDF]
Purpose To compare dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation with multiple screw fixation for intracapsular hip fractures in terms of complications and conversion to hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Prithee Jettoo, Philip James
doaj +3 more sources
A Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screw Versus Multiple Cannulated Compression Screw Fixation in Undisplaced Intracapsular Neck of Femur Fractures. [PDF]
Background Femoral neck fractures are common injuries. Although many studies have compared two-hole dynamic hip screw (DHS) versus multiple cannulated cancellous screw (CCS) fixation for undisplaced intracapsular fractured neck of femurs (NOF), there is ...
Cullen SE +5 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Dynamic Hip Screw Blade Fixation for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures [PDF]
link_to_OA_fulltext
Anoop C Dhamangaonkar
doaj +5 more sources
Mean Tip Apex Distance in Patients undergoing Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation for Pertrochanteric Fractures without using Traction Table: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study [PDF]
Introduction: Dynamic Hip Screw fixation has shown to be equally effective compared to cephalomedullary nailing. The effectiveness of dynamic hip screw fixation for pertrochanteric fractures without using traction table is not well investigated.
Subhash Regmi +4 more
doaj +2 more sources
Commentary: Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation versus Multiple Screw Fixation for Intracapsular Hip Fracture [PDF]
of fragility hip fracture also increases. By 2050, the incidence is predicted to be around 4.5 million.1 Treatment of intracapsular hip fractures depends on many factors including patient age, fracture pattern, degree of fracture displacement and comorbidities. For younger patients (
Tak Man Wong
doaj +4 more sources
Biomechanical comparison of the undercut thread design versus conventional buttress thread for the lag screw of the dynamic hip screw system. [PDF]
Objective: To compare the fixation stability of the lag screw with a undercut thread design for the dynamic hip screw (DHS) system versus the lag screw with the conventional buttress thread.
Liu F, Feng X, Zheng J, Leung F, Chen B.
europepmc +2 more sources
Angle-Adjustable Dynamic Hip Screw Plate for Unstable Trochanteric Fractures in Middle-Aged Patients: Mid-Term Outcomes and Return to Sport. [PDF]
Background: There are conflicting results in the literature regarding the superiority of proximal femoral nails over dynamic hip screw (DHS) plates.
Andriollo L +5 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Cephalomedullary Nailing versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation in Basicervical Femoral Neck Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [PDF]
Purpose Although many studies have reported the use of dynamic hip screws (DHS) and cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) for basicervical femoral neck fracture (BFNF), no clear treatment protocols have been recommended.
Yoon YC, Kim CH, Kim YC, Song HK.
europepmc +2 more sources
Dynamic hip screw versus intramedullary nailing for the treatment of A1 intertrochanteric fractures: A retrospective, comparative study and cost analysis. [PDF]
Objectives This study aims to compare sliding hip screw and intramedullary nail perioperative results and costs in two-part femoral fractures. Patients and methods Between January 2015 and December 2019, a total of 85 patients (70 males, 15 females; mean
Alessio-Mazzola M +4 more
europepmc +2 more sources

