Results 321 to 330 of about 102,963 (360)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Epistemic Determiners

Journal of Semantics, 2006
The present paper offers a contrastive examination of French items that require some knowledge of the speaker and items that require some ignorance. We relate this difference in a systematic way to the well?known problem of ?identifiability'in epistemic logic.
Jayez, Jacques, Tovena, Lucia
openaire   +1 more source

Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Trust

Social Epistemology, 2012
Miranda Fricker has introduced the insightful notion of epistemic injustice in the philosophical debate, thus bridging concerns of social epistemology with questions that arise in the area of social and cultural studies. I concentrate my analysis of her treatment of testimonial injustice. According to Fricker, the central cases of testimonial injustice
openaire   +1 more source

Epistemic Desiderata and Epistemic Pluralism

Journal of Philosophical Research, 2010
In this article I argue that Alston's recent meta-epistemological approach in terms of epistemic desiderata is not as epistemically plural as he claims it to be. After some preliminary remarks, I briefly recapitulate Alston's epistemic desiderata approach.
openaire   +2 more sources

Epistemically Different Epistemic Peers

Topoi, 2019
For over a decade now epistemologists have been thinking about the peer disagreement problem of whether a person is reasonable in not lowering her confidence in her belief P when she comes to accept that she has an epistemic peer on P who disbelieves P.
Mariangela Zoe Cocchiaro, Bryan Frances
openaire   +1 more source

Epistemic Gradualism Versus Epistemic Absolutism

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 2021
AbstractEpistemic absolutism holds that knowledge‐that is ungradable, while epistemic gradualism argues the opposite. This paper purports to remodel the gradualism/absolutism debate. The current model initiated by Stephen Hetherington fails to capture the genuine divergence between the two views, which makes the debate equivocal, and the gradualist ...
openaire   +1 more source

Epistemic Hubris

Social Epistemology
It is common nowadays for laypeople to take public stances on complex issues, such as the effectiveness of a vaccine or the seriousness of anthro- pogenic climate change, without any kind of disciplinary expertise. Yet those who do so act as if they were experts in the field, disseminating their thoughts and sometimes also spreading their advice ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Solidarity

2021
Abstract This chapter contains two more arguments against pessimism about moral testimony. First, it argues that epistemic justice sometimes requires you to accept moral testimony, despite the fact that doing so seems to clash with autonomy. Both good and bad experiences teach a person what matters, and how much things matter.
openaire   +1 more source

Epistemic Equivalence and Epistemic Incapacitation

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2012
AbstractOne typical realist response to the argument from underdetermination of theories by evidence is an appeal to epistemic criteria besides the empirical evidence to argue that, while scientifi...
openaire   +1 more source

Epistemic responsibility without epistemic agency

Philosophical Explorations, 2009
This article discusses the arguments against associating epistemic responsibility with the ordinary notion of agency. I examine the various 'Kantian' views which lead to a distinctive conception of epistemic agency and epistemic responsibility. I try to explain why we can be held responsible for our beliefs in the sense of obeying norms which regulate ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy