Results 221 to 230 of about 77,805 (270)
The Curious <i>U</i>: Integrating Theories Linking Knowledge and Information-Seeking Behavior. [PDF]
Ten A, Oudeyer PY, Sakaki M, Murayama K.
europepmc +1 more source
Forms of life: a literary formalist view on biological individuality. [PDF]
Brandt TJ.
europepmc +1 more source
Reasons underdetermination in meaningful human control. [PDF]
Kozlovski A.
europepmc +1 more source
Reading and relating with Frieda Fromm‐Reichmann and Joanne Greenberg
Critical Quarterly, EarlyView.
Joshua Pugh
wiley +1 more source
Semantics for intuitionistic epistemic logics of shallow depths for game theory
openaire
FROM CLASSICAL TO EPISTEMIC GAME THEORY [PDF]
In this paper, we give a historical overview of the transition from classical game theory to epistemic game theory. To that purpose we will discuss how important notions such as reasoning about the opponents, belief hierarchies, common belief, and the concept of common belief in rationality arose, and gradually entered the game theoretic picture ...
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Epistemic Game Theory: Complete Information
2010A game of incomplete information is a game in which at least some of the players possess private information which may be relevant to the strategic interaction. The private information of a player may be about the payoff functions in the game, as well as about some exogenous, payoff-irrelevant events.
Steven N. Durlauf, Lawrence E. Blume
openaire +1 more source
2015
Abstract Epistemic game theory formalizes assumptions about rationality and mutual beliefs in a formal language, then studies their behavioral implications in games. Specifically, it asks: what do different notions of rationality and different assumptions about what players believe about…what others believe about the rationality of players imply ...
Eddie Dekel, Marciano Siniscalchi
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Epistemic game theory formalizes assumptions about rationality and mutual beliefs in a formal language, then studies their behavioral implications in games. Specifically, it asks: what do different notions of rationality and different assumptions about what players believe about…what others believe about the rationality of players imply ...
Eddie Dekel, Marciano Siniscalchi
openaire +1 more source
2012
In everyday life we must often reach decisions while knowing that the outcome will not only depend on our own choice, but also on the choices of others. These situations are the focus of epistemic game theory. Unlike classical game theory, it explores how people may reason about their opponents before they make their final choice in a game. Packed with
openaire +2 more sources
In everyday life we must often reach decisions while knowing that the outcome will not only depend on our own choice, but also on the choices of others. These situations are the focus of epistemic game theory. Unlike classical game theory, it explores how people may reason about their opponents before they make their final choice in a game. Packed with
openaire +2 more sources

