Results 231 to 240 of about 77,805 (270)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Epistemic Game Theory: Beliefs and Types
2010John Harsanyi (1967–8) introduced the formalism of type spaces to provide a simple and parsimonious representation of belief hierarchies. He explicitly noted that his formalism was not limited to modelling a player’s beliefs about payoff-relevant variables: rather, its strength was precisely the ease with which Ann’s beliefs about Bob’s beliefs about ...
Steven N. Durlauf, Lawrence E. Blume
openaire +1 more source
Epistemic Game Theory: An Overview
2010The following three articles survey some aspects of the foundations of non-cooperative game theory. The goal of work in foundations is to examine in detail the basic ingredients of game analysis.
Steven N. Durlauf, Lawrence E. Blume
openaire +1 more source
Towards a categorical approach for meta-modelling epistemic game theory
Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 19th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, 2016In order to optimize the use of resources of interdependent systems we need to perform strategic analysis of resources. Game theory is the discipline of science that studies strategy. Epistemic game theory explores how individuals reason about others choices for decision making.
Fazle Rabbi, Yngve Lamo, Ingrid Chieh Yu
openaire +1 more source
How to Interpret Belief Hierarchies in Bayesian Game Theory: A Dilemma for the Epistemic Program
Erkenntnis, 2021This article proposes two interpretations of the concept of belief hierarchies in Bayesian game theory: the behaviorist interpretation and the mentalist interpretation. On the former, belief hierarchies are derived from the players’ preferences over acts.
openaire +3 more sources
The epistemic structure of a theory of a game
Theory and Decision, 1994zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +1 more source
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2009
The paper argues that the Nash Equilibrium Refinement Programme was less successful than its competitor, the Epistemic Programme (Interactive Epistemology). The prime criterion of success is the extent to which the programmes were able to reach the key objective guiding non-cooperative game theory for much of the twentieth century, namely, to develop a
openaire +2 more sources
The paper argues that the Nash Equilibrium Refinement Programme was less successful than its competitor, the Epistemic Programme (Interactive Epistemology). The prime criterion of success is the extent to which the programmes were able to reach the key objective guiding non-cooperative game theory for much of the twentieth century, namely, to develop a
openaire +2 more sources
Two lectures on the epistemic foundations of game theory [PDF]
, 2007 This working paper contains the slides of two invited lectures on the Epistemic Foundations of Game Theory, delivered at the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) on February 8, 2007.
openaire +1 more source
Epistemic Logic and the Theory of Games and Decisions
1997Introduction M.O.L. Bacharach, et al. Part I: Iterated Knowledge and Common Knowledge. 1. On the Logic of Common Belief and Common Knowledge L. Lismont, P. Mongin. 2. A Complete Epistemic Logic for Multiple Agents W. van der Hoek, J.J. Meyer. 3. Axiomatic Indefinability of Common Knowledge in Finitary Logics M. Kaneko, T. Nagashima. 4.
openaire +1 more source
Epistemic logic and the foundations of game theory
Theory and Decision, 1994Michael Bacharach, Philippe Mongin
openaire +1 more source
Poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors: Exploiting a synthetic lethal strategy in the clinic
Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2011Timothy A Yap, Johann Sebastian de Bono
exaly