Results 191 to 200 of about 21,777 (290)

Re-storying health promotion models toward population sovereignty. [PDF]

Front Public Health
Olson K, Erb M, Si'al E, Piechowski A, Riegert J, Ranjbar N.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Sufficient Reason Vindicated

Analytic Philosophy, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT I give an argument for a version of the principle of sufficient reason from several plausible principles about negative facts and sufficient conditions. I then give an argument for a slightly weaker version of the principle without the reference to negative facts.
Stephen Harrop
wiley   +1 more source

Ubuntu as a blueprint: learning ethical transdisciplinarity from African indigenous knowledge systems. [PDF]

Front Res Metr Anal
Gqaleni N, Foláyan MO.
europepmc   +1 more source

Virtuous Religious Dogmatism: A Response to Hook and Davis [PDF]

, 2018
Church, Ian M.
core  

Argumentatively Navigating Deep Disagreements

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT When disagreements cut deep, epistemic agents face a predicament. Although disagreements have been widely hailed for their epistemic benefits, deep disagreements are often plagued with argumentative hurdles preventing the attainment of such epistemic goods.
Jordi Fairhurst
wiley   +1 more source

Principles for ethical research in the Himalayas: Decolonising research ethics across the disciplines. [PDF]

Humanit Soc Sci Commun
Malik IH.
europepmc   +1 more source

An adversarial collaboration on the rigidity‐of‐the‐right, symmetry thesis, or rigidity‐of‐extremes: The answer depends on the question

Political Psychology, EarlyView.
Abstract In an adversarial collaboration, two preregistered U.S.‐based studies (total N = 6181) tested three hypotheses regarding the relationship between political ideology and belief rigidity (operationalized as less evidence‐based belief updating): rigidity‐of‐the‐right, symmetry, and rigidity‐of‐extremes.
Shauna M. Bowes, Cory J. Clark, Lucian Gideon Conway III, Thomas Costello, Danny Osborne, Philip E. Tetlock, Jan‐Willem van Prooijen   +6 more
wiley   +1 more source

Advocacy and Assessment: Ethical Dilemmas and Practice Considerations in Pediatric Asylum Evaluations. [PDF]

Am J Bioeth
Rosenberg J, Kazmir S, Bunn M, Rodriguez Y, Giri M.   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source

How deep a divide do we tolerate? Measuring the willingness to engage with differently minded others (WEDO)

Political Psychology, EarlyView.
Abstract Fostering contact across political camps is crucial to combat affective polarization and to sustain healthy democratic discourse. Researchers therefore have become increasingly interested in better understanding the factors that promote or hamper political exchange.
Melissa Jauch, Olivia Fischer, Mariela E. Jaffé, Rainer Greifeneder   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Why science must speak differently. [PDF]

Infect Agent Cancer
Branda F, Campanozzi LL, Scarpa F, Tambone V, Ciccozzi M.   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source