Results 41 to 50 of about 6,700 (225)
The Role of Trust in Argumentation
Informal Logic, 2020 Argumentation is important for sharing knowledge and information. Given that the receiver of an argument purportedly engages first and foremost with its content, one might expect trust to play a negligible epistemic role, as opposed to its crucial role ...
Catarina Dutilh Novaes
doaj +1 more source
Advanced Intelligent Discovery, EarlyView.This article establishes a Taguchi–Bayesian sampling strategy to reconstruct polymer processing–property landscape at minimal sampling cost, generically building the roadmap for materials database construction from sampling their vast design space. This sampling strategy is featured by an alternating lesson between uniformity and representativeness ...
Han Liu, Liantang Li
wiley +1 more source
Predicting Performance of Hall Effect Ion Source Using Machine Learning
Advanced Intelligent Systems, Volume 7, Issue 3, March 2025.This study introduces HallNN, a machine learning tool for predicting Hall effect ion source performance using a neural network ensemble trained on data generated from numerical simulations. HallNN provides faster and more accurate predictions than numerical methods and traditional scaling laws, making it valuable for designing and optimizing Hall ...
Jaehong Park +8 more
wiley +1 more source
FROM CRITICAL THINKING TO CRITICAL TRUST: THE CASE FOR ONLINE LEARNING
Russian Journal of Education and PsychologyBackground. On one hand, education is a specific form of social interaction where participants’ trust is a prerequisite rather than an outcome. On the other hand, the contemporary informational environment, in which new educational practices emerge, is ...
Anastasiia V. Golubinskaya +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Epistemic Self-Trust and Doxastic Disagreements [PDF]
Erkenntnis, 2018 The recent literature on the epistemology of disagreement focuses on the rational response question: how are you rationally required to respond to a doxastic disagreement with someone, especially with someone you take to be your epistemic peer? A doxastic disagreement with someone also confronts you with a slightly different question.
openaire +2 more sources
Deep Disagreement, Epistemic Norms, and Epistemic Self-trust
Episteme, 2023 AbstractSometimes we disagree because of fundamental differences in what we treat as reasons for belief. Such are ‘deep disagreements'. Amongst the questions we might ask about deep disagreement is the epistemic normative one: how ought one to respond to disagreement, when that disagreement is deep. This paper addresses that question.
openaire +1 more source
Trust in health care and vaccine hesitancy
Rivista di Estetica, 2019 Health care systems can positively influence our personal decision-making and health-related behavior only if we trust them. I propose a conceptual analysis of the trust relation between the public and a healthcare system, drawing from healthcare studies
Elisabetta Lalumera
doaj +1 more source
American Journal of Community Psychology, EarlyView.Abstract This paper describes a 3‐year community–partnered research initiative focused on advancing early reading, racial equity, and relationships—collectively known as the 3Rs Initiative. The project brought together researchers and community members committed to ensuring that all adults in the county embody a shared “3Rs mindset” to better support ...
Shannon B. Wanless +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Trust and distrust in contradictory information transmission
Applied Network Science, 2017 We analyse the problem of contradictory information distribution in networks of agents with positive and negative trust. The networks of interest are built by ranked agents with different epistemic attitudes. In this context, positive trust is a property
Giuseppe Primiero +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Exploitative Epistemic Trust [PDF]
, 2019 Where there is trust, there is also vulnerability, and vulnerability can be exploited. Epistemic trust is no exception. This chapter maps the phenomenon of the exploitation of epistemic trust. Dormandy starts with a discussion of how trust in general can be exploited; a key observation is that trust incurs vulnerabilities not just for the party doing ...
openaire +1 more source