Results 121 to 130 of about 930 (169)
Self-Trapped Excitons in Carbon Quantum Dots with Large NIR-II Photo-Thermoelectric Catalysis Induce Pyroptosis for Cancer Therapy. [PDF]
Adv Sci (Weinh)Zhang T +10 more
europepmc +1 more source
Photodynamic Therapy Combined with Anticancer Drug Therapy in the Treatment of Malignant Neoplasms. [PDF]
CellsReshetov I +18 more
europepmc +1 more source
Neural circuit mechanisms underlying dominance traits and social competition. [PDF]
Biophys Rev (Melville)Yan H, Wang J.
europepmc +1 more source
Deep Tumor Penetration Using Nanoparticle Delivery Systems: Programmed Design Strategies and Emerging Evaluation Platforms. [PDF]
Int J NanomedicineJavan M +2 more
europepmc +1 more source
In Our Mind's Eye: Thinkable and Unthinkable, and Classical and Quantum in Fundamental Physics, with Schrödinger's Cat Experiment. [PDF]
Entropy (Basel)Plotnitsky A.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Physics Reports, 1978
Abstract Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) argued in 1935 that quantum mechanics fails to give an adequate description of physical reality, and also cannot give a consistent wave-function description of certain phenomena. We show that a calculation based upon the reduced density matrix removes the formal inconsistency pointed out by EPR.
C.D. Cantrell, Marlan O. Scully
exaly +2 more sources
Abstract Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) argued in 1935 that quantum mechanics fails to give an adequate description of physical reality, and also cannot give a consistent wave-function description of certain phenomena. We show that a calculation based upon the reduced density matrix removes the formal inconsistency pointed out by EPR.
C.D. Cantrell, Marlan O. Scully
exaly +2 more sources
Physics World, 1995
Colin Jack is to be complimented on his entertaining exposition of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in "Sherlock Holmes investigates the EPR paradox" (April pp39–42), but the more serious explanation he gives is misleading in an important respect. There is, and need be, no "influence" travelling from one detector to the other.
Peter Bussey +4 more
exaly +2 more sources
Colin Jack is to be complimented on his entertaining exposition of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in "Sherlock Holmes investigates the EPR paradox" (April pp39–42), but the more serious explanation he gives is misleading in an important respect. There is, and need be, no "influence" travelling from one detector to the other.
Peter Bussey +4 more
exaly +2 more sources
AIP Conference Proceedings, 2004
The orbital angular momentum [OAM] of light and its applications in quantum telecommunication and cryptography has recently attracted scientific attention. In this context also entanglement and the implications of the Einstein‐Podolsky‐Rosen [EPR] experiment have experienced a renewed interest. In an attempt to find an experimentally feasible criterion
Stephen Barnett, Franke-Arnold Sonja
exaly +2 more sources
The orbital angular momentum [OAM] of light and its applications in quantum telecommunication and cryptography has recently attracted scientific attention. In this context also entanglement and the implications of the Einstein‐Podolsky‐Rosen [EPR] experiment have experienced a renewed interest. In an attempt to find an experimentally feasible criterion
Stephen Barnett, Franke-Arnold Sonja
exaly +2 more sources