Results 131 to 140 of about 11,600 (178)
Overcoming tumor microenvironment barriers: transformable and bioinspired nanomedicine strategies for deep tumor penetration. [PDF]
J NanobiotechnologySheng J +6 more
europepmc +1 more source
Machine learning detection of Gaussian steering in continuous-variable systems under data imbalance. [PDF]
Sci RepGuo J, Yan T, Hou J, Qi X, He K.
europepmc +1 more source
The Information Loss Problem and Hawking Radiation as Tunneling. [PDF]
Entropy (Basel)Zhang B, Corda C, Cai Q.
europepmc +1 more source
Can We Protect Our Hearts by Sweating Out Excess Sodium? [PDF]
Exerc Sport Sci RevHoch JW, Watso JC.
europepmc +1 more source
A practical 4.8-V Li||LiCoO<sub>2</sub> battery. [PDF]
Sci AdvXiong Q +11 more
europepmc +1 more source
Transforming dementia care pathway: why shifting to a universal, comprehensive, proactive, local, and integrated model is imperative to improve outcomes. [PDF]
Front DementNair P +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Physics Reports, 1978
Abstract Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) argued in 1935 that quantum mechanics fails to give an adequate description of physical reality, and also cannot give a consistent wave-function description of certain phenomena. We show that a calculation based upon the reduced density matrix removes the formal inconsistency pointed out by EPR.
C.D. Cantrell, Marlan O. Scully
exaly +2 more sources
Abstract Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) argued in 1935 that quantum mechanics fails to give an adequate description of physical reality, and also cannot give a consistent wave-function description of certain phenomena. We show that a calculation based upon the reduced density matrix removes the formal inconsistency pointed out by EPR.
C.D. Cantrell, Marlan O. Scully
exaly +2 more sources
Physics World, 1995
Colin Jack is to be complimented on his entertaining exposition of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in "Sherlock Holmes investigates the EPR paradox" (April pp39–42), but the more serious explanation he gives is misleading in an important respect. There is, and need be, no "influence" travelling from one detector to the other.
Peter Bussey +4 more
exaly +2 more sources
Colin Jack is to be complimented on his entertaining exposition of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in "Sherlock Holmes investigates the EPR paradox" (April pp39–42), but the more serious explanation he gives is misleading in an important respect. There is, and need be, no "influence" travelling from one detector to the other.
Peter Bussey +4 more
exaly +2 more sources