Results 181 to 190 of about 253 (229)
Using [18F]‐SMBT‐1 PET, we longitudinally tracked MAO‐B–expressing reactive astrocytes during orofacial neuropathic pain development in rats, revealing region‐ and time‐specific astrocyte activation during pain chronification. ABSTRACT Chronic neuropathic pain represents a significant global health burden and is hypothesized to be maintained by an ...
Lewis S. Crawford +14 more
wiley +1 more source
Epigenetic and Brain Structure Covariation Patterns in Typical and Atypical Development
We present a map linking DNA methylation to brain structure in childhood. Genes in which methylation was linked to brain anatomy are highly enriched for those implicated in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders, highlighting potential epigenetic targets for understanding both typical and atypical brain development.
Valentine Chirokoff +5 more
wiley +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Split Ergativity is not about Ergativity
2017AbstractThis chapter argues that split ergativity is epiphenomenal, and that the factors which trigger its appearance are not limited to ergative systems in the first place. In both aspectual and person splits, the split is the result of a bifurcation of the clause into two distinct case/agreement domains, which renders the clause structurally ...
Jessica Coon, Omer Preminger
openaire +1 more source
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2009
Abstract Ergativity refers to patterning in a language whereby the subject of a transitive clause behaves differently to the subject of an intransitive clause, which behaves like the object of a transitive clause. Ergativity can be manifested in morphology, lexicon, syntax, and discourse organisation.
openaire +2 more sources
Abstract Ergativity refers to patterning in a language whereby the subject of a transitive clause behaves differently to the subject of an intransitive clause, which behaves like the object of a transitive clause. Ergativity can be manifested in morphology, lexicon, syntax, and discourse organisation.
openaire +2 more sources
Recording Rod ON and OFF Responses in ERG and Multifocal ERG
Documenta Ophthalmologica, 2005The 5 Hz rectangle stimulus was generally used to record cone ON and OFF response. In this study, the feasibility and recording conditions of recording rod ON and OFF responses in electroretinograms (ERG) and multifocal electroretinograms (mf-ERG) were described, and the character and influence factors of these responses were observed.
Changzheng, Chen +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
2023
AbstractThe vast majority of Australian languages are morphologically ergative, with the nominal in the A role marked with an ergative suffix and the S and O unmarked. Nonetheless, almost all morphologically-ergative Australian languages are syntactically-accusative, i.e.
Dunn, Vivien, Meakins, Felicity
openaire +2 more sources
AbstractThe vast majority of Australian languages are morphologically ergative, with the nominal in the A role marked with an ergative suffix and the S and O unmarked. Nonetheless, almost all morphologically-ergative Australian languages are syntactically-accusative, i.e.
Dunn, Vivien, Meakins, Felicity
openaire +2 more sources
1983
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1983. ; MICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND ENGINEERING ; Bibliography: leaves 367-373. ; by Beth Carol Levin. ; Ph.D.
openaire +1 more source
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1983. ; MICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND ENGINEERING ; Bibliography: leaves 367-373. ; by Beth Carol Levin. ; Ph.D.
openaire +1 more source
Language, 1979
Morphological marking, whether realized by nominal case inflections or cross-referencing on the verb, can be either (i) ergative, marking transitive subject [A] function, vs. absolutive, marking intransitive subject [S] and transitive object [O]; or (ii) nominative, marking A and S, vs. accusative, marking O function.
openaire +1 more source
Morphological marking, whether realized by nominal case inflections or cross-referencing on the verb, can be either (i) ergative, marking transitive subject [A] function, vs. absolutive, marking intransitive subject [S] and transitive object [O]; or (ii) nominative, marking A and S, vs. accusative, marking O function.
openaire +1 more source

