Results 21 to 30 of about 866,840 (339)
Research ethics committees and paternalism [PDF]
Journal of Medical Ethics, 2004 In this paper the authors argue that research ethics committees (RECs) should not be paternalistic by rejecting research that poses risk to people competent to decide for themselves. However it is important they help to ensure valid consent is sought from potential recruits and protect vulnerable people who cannot look after their own best interests ...
S J L, Edwards, S, Kirchin, R, Huxtable
openaire +2 more sources
Reforming research ethics committees [PDF]
BMJ, 2005 For the first 25 years of their existence in the United Kingdom research ethics committees were left more or less in peace by the Department of Health. Since the publication of the “red book” in 1991,1 however, they have undergone a continual process of radical change, from the introduction of multicentre research ethics committees in 1997, through ...
Ashcroft, RE, Newson, AJ, Benn, PMW
openaire +2 more sources
Young people's views about the purpose and composition of research ethics committees:findings from the PEARL qualitative study [PDF]
, 2016 BACKGROUND: Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) is a birth cohort study within which the Project to Enhance ALSPAC through Record Linkage (PEARL) was established to enrich the ALSPAC resource through linkage between ALSPAC ...
Audrey, Suzanne +4 more
core +2 more sources
Research Ethics Committees [PDF]
British Journal of General Practice, 2008 Trials and Tribulations by Saul Miller1 takes the National Research Ethics Service to task for the closure of the Northumberland Research Ethics Committee (REC), but there are compelling reasons behind this decision. The Northumberland closure is part …
openaire +2 more sources
NHS research ethics committees [PDF]
BMJ, 2007 National Health Service research ethics committees exist to ensure that research performed within the NHS complies with recognised ethical standards and to protect the rights, safety, and dignity of all actual or potential participants. In the past decade the operation of research ethics committees has come under, and continues to come under, close ...
Louise, Robinson +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
A 'good' ethical review: audit and professionalism in research ethics [PDF]
, 2015 How does one conduct, measure and record a ‘good’ ethical review of biomedical research? To what extent do ethics committees invoke professionalism in researchers and in themselves, and to what extent do they see competence as adherence to a set of ...
Brown +40 more
core +1 more source
BMC Medical Ethics, 2020 In the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, the biomedical research community’s attempt to focus the attention on fighting COVID-19, led to several challenges within the field of research ethics. However, we know little about the practical relevance of these
Alice Faust +5 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
The National Ethics Committee: a truly valuable asset for clinical trials? [PDF]
, 2017 Advances in biomedicine, increased patient autonomy, and higher average life expectancy, have contributed to raising a multitude of questions relating to Clinical Ethics.
Campanozzi, Laura Leontina +2 more
core +1 more source
Research ethics committees: agents of research policy?
Health Research Policy and Systems, 2005 The purpose of this commentary is to describe the unintended effects ethics committees may have on research and to analyse the regulatory and administrative problems of clinical trials.
Hemminki Elina
doaj +1 more source
Artificial intelligence and medical research databases: ethical review by data access committees
BMC Medical Ethics, 2023 Background It has been argued that ethics review committees—e.g., Research Ethics Committees, Institutional Review Boards, etc.— have weaknesses in reviewing big data and artificial intelligence research. For instance, they may, due to the novelty of the
Francis McKay +5 more
doaj +1 more source