Results 61 to 70 of about 183 (95)
The Euthyphro dilemma, originating from Plato’s dialogue, poses the question: Is something good because the gods command it, or do the gods command it because it is good? This classical paradox highlights a deep tension between arbitrariness and independence in the foundations of morality.
openaire +2 more sources
Theistic Ethics and the Euthyphro Dilemma [PDF]
It is widely believed that the Divine Command Theory is untenable due to the Euthyphro Dilemma. This article first examines the Platonic dialogue of that name, and shows that Socrates’s reasoning is faulty. Second, the dilemma in the form in which many contemporary philosophers accept it is examined in detail, and this reasoning is also shown to be ...
Richard Joyce
exaly +3 more sources
A Response to Old Riddles and a New Typology: On the Euthyphro Dilemma and Theomonism
This chapter argues for a reading of Schelling that is able to offer a satisfactory response to the Euthyphro Dilemma while also avoiding the pitfall of onto-theology, that is, grounding God’s existence in reason alone while grounding the being of reason in God. Eternal truths of reason exist only because God exists, but God only exists as God by means
Tyler Tritten
exaly +3 more sources
In the Wake of Euthyphro's False Dilemma
All moral apologists, at one time or another, engage with the Euthyphro dilemma and all theologians engage, at one point or another, the issue of continuity or discontinuity of the Mosaic Covenant and Torah in general. The general view among apologists is that correct theology can be determined by its logical consistency and explanatory power ...
McKenzie, Gregory S
openaire +4 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 1972
but sometimes searching arguments of the Euthyphro, and in the obviously parallel passage in Republic 378(a) to 383(c). Both the early dialogue and the passage in the Republic concerning the censorship of what may legitimately be said concerning the gods involve several metaphysical assumptions.
D. M. MacKinnon, Hugo Meynell
exaly +2 more sources
but sometimes searching arguments of the Euthyphro, and in the obviously parallel passage in Republic 378(a) to 383(c). Both the early dialogue and the passage in the Republic concerning the censorship of what may legitimately be said concerning the gods involve several metaphysical assumptions.
D. M. MacKinnon, Hugo Meynell
exaly +2 more sources
Religion, morality, and the Euthyphro dilemma
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 1984In what follows, I shall sketch MacBeath 's argument, make some observations c< cerning Kant's understanding of the relationship between morality and religi that are intended to show that MacBeath's analysis has misconstrued the nati of the Euthyphro dilemma, and conclude that Socrates had Euthyphro on 1 ropes after all. MacBeath begins by showing that
George W Harris
exaly +2 more sources
What Does the Euthyphro Dilemma Reveal about the Nature of Allah?
In their book, Good God: The Theistic Foundations of Morality, David Baggett & Jerry Walls discuss the nature of the God of Christianity by studying the Euthyphro dilemma. This paper shall follow Louise Antony, Walls, and Baggett’s model of the Euthyphro dilemma (Divine Command Theory) and uses it as an objective moral standard to study the nature of ...
Khouri, Sherene N.
openaire +4 more sources
A way out of the Euthyphro dilemma
AbstractI defend the view that morality depends on God against the Euthyphro dilemma by arguing that the reasons that God has for determining the moral–natural dependencies might be personal reasons that have non-moral content. I deflect the ‘arbitrary whim’ worry, but I concede that the account cannot extend to the goodness of God and His will ...
NICK ZANGWILL
openaire +2 more sources

