Results 161 to 170 of about 3,120,341 (203)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: The use of noise estimate
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1980One of the main difficulties with the interpretation of evoked potential data is the question of how much noise is contained within the average. This question is crucial in deciding whether any particular peak component is a genuine signal, or whether it is a random occurrence due to noise.
P K, Wong, R G, Bickford
openaire +2 more sources
Brain stem auditory evoked potentials in unmedicated schizophrenic patients
Biological Psychiatry, 1985Numerous differences in auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) have been found between schizophrenic patients and normal controls. Roemer et al. (1979) have reported decreased stability in the AEP to click stimuli from 15 to 450 msec poststimulus: Shagass et al.
M, Brecher, H, Begleiter
openaire +2 more sources
Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in children with perinatal encephalopathies
Clinical Neurophysiology, 2000We sought to describe if neurological damage, in terms of brain lesions, syndrome and syndrome severity led to abnormalities in the brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in order to provide a profile of children that could be used as an indicator of subsequent neurological sequelae.
G, Romero +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Postnatal development of the brain stem auditory-evoked potential in dogs
American Journal of Veterinary Research, 1991SUMMARY Recordings of averaged brain stem auditory-evoked potentials were obtained from 13 Beagle pups of both genders to document the postnatal development of the response from age 1 to 76 days. Responses were recorded between needle electrodes placed on the vertex and the ipsilateral ear, with ground at the interorbital line.
G M, Strain, B L, Tedford, R M, Jackson
openaire +2 more sources
Brain stem auditory‐evoked potentials in different strains of rodents
Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 1990This study was conducted to evaluate variations in brain stem auditory‐evoked potentials (BAEPs) among different strains of rodents. BAEPs were recorded by routine procedures from rodents of different strains or species. These included 22 Long‐Evans, 28 Wistar and 28 Sprague‐Dawley rats, and six hamsters.
T J, Chen, S S, Chen
openaire +2 more sources
Maturation of the brain-stem auditory evoked potential in premature infants
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1985Patterns of development and extent of variability of the brain-stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) are described in 52 healthy premature infants and 50 normal term newborns with reliable conceptional ages. Binaural and monaural stimulation are compared.
A, Krumholz +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Classification of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials by syntactic methods
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1986A syntactic pattern recognition procedure for classification of brain-stem auditory evoked potential (BSAEP) is presented. A pre-processing stage of zero-phase bandpass filtering enhances the peaks and suppresses the noise. A finite-state grammar was designed to identify the peaks.
G P, Madhavan +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in different age groups
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1985Brain-stem auditory potential (BAEP) latencies were measured from individuals with normal or nearly normal hearing. Different age groups were studied separately. Males have 0.1-0.2 msec longer latencies of waves III and V and longer I-V IPLs than females in all age groups.
U, Rosenhall +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
[Auditory evoked potentials of the brain stem in brain death].
Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation, 1988Brainstem auditory evoked responses were recorded in a neurosurgical intensive care unit in 38 patients who had all the clinical criteria for brain death. Of the brain-dead patients, 65.8% never showed a response. 3.42% showed a type I wave, which was unilateral in 26.3% and bilateral in the other 7.9%. Types II to VII waves were never seen.
J M, Desbordes +6 more
openaire +1 more source
Brain stem auditory, visual and somatosensory evoked potentials in leukodystrophies
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1982Brain stem auditory (BAERs), visual (VEPs) and somatosensory evoked responses (SEPs) were recorded in 12 patients with Pelizaeus-Merzbacher leukodystrophy (PMD), three with adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) and three with metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD). All the 3 evoked responses were abnormal in all patients except normal VEPs and SEPs in a patient with ...
O N, Markand +4 more
openaire +2 more sources