Results 31 to 40 of about 1,210,838 (279)

Screening for lung cancer: A systematic review of overdiagnosis and its implications

open access: yesMolecular Oncology, EarlyView.
Low‐dose computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer may increase overdiagnosis compared to no screening, though the risk is likely low versus chest X‐ray. Our review of 8 trials (84 660 participants) shows added costs. Further research with strict adherence to modern nodule management strategies may help determine the extent to which ...
Fiorella Karina Fernández‐Sáenz   +12 more
wiley   +1 more source

Expert opinion in criminal matters based on the new Law on criminal procedure [PDF]

open access: yesGlasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, 2015
In this paper the author has presented a full and systematic review of the legal provisions on furnishing evidence through expert opinion based on the new Law on Criminal Procedure.
Grubač Momčilo
doaj  

PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF VALIDITY IN FORENSIC PRACTICE

open access: yesТеория и практика судебной экспертизы, 2018
The author reflects on the philosophical problem of reliability of expert knowledge, not only as a procedural attribute of judicial proceedings, but primarily as a functional principle in building the entire system of forensic expert activity.
Igor' A. Grigor'ev
doaj   +1 more source

The determinants of expert opinion in the development of care pathways: insights from an exploratory cluster analysis

open access: yesBMC Health Services Research, 2023
Background We performed a secondary exploratory cluster analysis on the data collected from the validation phase of the study leading to the development of the model care pathway (CP) for Myasthenia Gravis (MG), in which a panel of 85 international ...
Matteo Ratti   +6 more
doaj   +1 more source

Expert opinion: uncertainties in hydraulic roughness [PDF]

open access: yes, 2005
Water level predictions in rivers are used for a variety of purposes in water management. For example, designing flood defence measures and evaluating natural rehabilitation in flood plains, cannot be done without water level predictions.
Hulscher, S.J.M.H.   +2 more
core   +1 more source

Developing evidence‐based, cost‐effective P4 cancer medicine for driving innovation in prevention, therapeutics, patient care and reducing healthcare inequalities

open access: yesMolecular Oncology, EarlyView.
The cancer problem is increasing globally with projections up to the year 2050 showing unfavourable outcomes in terms of incidence and cancer‐related deaths. The main challenges are prevention, improved therapeutics resulting in increased cure rates and enhanced health‐related quality of life.
Ulrik Ringborg   +43 more
wiley   +1 more source

VARIASI ARGUMEN SAKSI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MENULIS ILMIAH BAGI MAHASISWA

open access: yesFon, 2022
ABSTRAK: Salah satu karakteristik artikel ilmiah ialah adanya variasi argumen sebagai bentuk pertanggungjawaban ilmiah seorang penulis terhadap isi artikelnya.
Antonius Nesi   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

PARP inhibition and pharmacological ascorbate demonstrate synergy in castration‐resistant prostate cancer

open access: yesMolecular Oncology, EarlyView.
Pharmacologic ascorbate (vitamin C) increases ROS, disrupts cellular metabolism, and induces DNA damage in CRPC cells. These effects sensitize tumors to PARP inhibition, producing synergistic growth suppression with olaparib in vitro and significantly delayed tumor progression in vivo. Pyruvate rescue confirms ROS‐dependent activity.
Nicolas Gordon   +13 more
wiley   +1 more source

The Differences and Connections Among Expert Evidence, Expert Opinion and Expert Consensus in the Development of Guidelines

open access: yesXiehe Yixue Zazhi
Expert evidence, expert opinion, and expert consensus are frequently mentioned and used in the process of guideline development. However, due to the lack of clear definitions and standards, there is confusion and misuse among the three in practice.
ZHU Di   +6 more
doaj   +1 more source

Overcoming Expert Disagreement In A Delphi Process. An Exercise In Reverse Epistemology [PDF]

open access: yes, 2015
Disagreement among experts is a central topic in social epistemology. What should an expert do when confronted with the different opinion of an epistemic peer?
Elisabetta, Lalumera
core   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy