Results 201 to 210 of about 5,351 (253)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1988
Lawyers do not testify; witnesses do. No matter how compelling the opening and closing statements of the trial lawyer, every juror is instructed that he or she is bound to reach conclusions that are based not on what the lawyers say, but on the evidence.
N K, Quinn, M A, Capron
openaire +2 more sources
Lawyers do not testify; witnesses do. No matter how compelling the opening and closing statements of the trial lawyer, every juror is instructed that he or she is bound to reach conclusions that are based not on what the lawyers say, but on the evidence.
N K, Quinn, M A, Capron
openaire +2 more sources
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1976
BURTON L. Wise1has noted the need to restructure the testimony of expert medical witnesses in courts of law in the United States. The main change proposed is that experts testify as unbiased witnesses reporting to the court, the material to be used by one or both sides as they see fit. This proposal is so obviously reasonable and equitable that it is a
openaire +2 more sources
BURTON L. Wise1has noted the need to restructure the testimony of expert medical witnesses in courts of law in the United States. The main change proposed is that experts testify as unbiased witnesses reporting to the court, the material to be used by one or both sides as they see fit. This proposal is so obviously reasonable and equitable that it is a
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2005
The question of whether the normative testimony of ethics experts should be admissible under the rules of evidence has been the subject of much debate. Professor Imwinkelried's paper is an effort to get us, for a moment, to change that subject. He seeks to turn our attention, instead, to a means by which bioethics experts’ normative analyses might come
openaire +2 more sources
The question of whether the normative testimony of ethics experts should be admissible under the rules of evidence has been the subject of much debate. Professor Imwinkelried's paper is an effort to get us, for a moment, to change that subject. He seeks to turn our attention, instead, to a means by which bioethics experts’ normative analyses might come
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Child Neurology, 1996
To the Editor: There is little doubt that my previous editorial on expert witness testimony [1] aroused considerable positive sentiments in the neurologic community. To date, the Academy has received several allegations of improper testimony by members.
openaire +3 more sources
To the Editor: There is little doubt that my previous editorial on expert witness testimony [1] aroused considerable positive sentiments in the neurologic community. To date, the Academy has received several allegations of improper testimony by members.
openaire +3 more sources
New England Journal of Medicine, 1970
THE trial of a criminal case is often a lopsided matter. On the prosecution side there is frequently a complete battery of medical experts, laboratories and a seemingly inexhaustible supply of funds with which to obtain other, expert testimony if needed.
openaire +2 more sources
THE trial of a criminal case is often a lopsided matter. On the prosecution side there is frequently a complete battery of medical experts, laboratories and a seemingly inexhaustible supply of funds with which to obtain other, expert testimony if needed.
openaire +2 more sources
Clinics in Perinatology, 2007
One of the most important interfaces between medicine and law occurs in the courtroom. When medical issues are litigated, physicians have potential to make excellent witnesses. This article reviews the proper role, qualifications, and ethical requirements of expert witnesses, the law of professional negligence, and the regulation of unprofessional ...
openaire +2 more sources
One of the most important interfaces between medicine and law occurs in the courtroom. When medical issues are litigated, physicians have potential to make excellent witnesses. This article reviews the proper role, qualifications, and ethical requirements of expert witnesses, the law of professional negligence, and the regulation of unprofessional ...
openaire +2 more sources
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1977
To the Editor.— I am concerned and dismayed by Dr Charles Aring's position on expert medical testimony in court (234:569, 1976). There are many who will agree with his boycotting the legal system unless he can appear on his own terms as a friend of the court. There are also those who disagree.
openaire +2 more sources
To the Editor.— I am concerned and dismayed by Dr Charles Aring's position on expert medical testimony in court (234:569, 1976). There are many who will agree with his boycotting the legal system unless he can appear on his own terms as a friend of the court. There are also those who disagree.
openaire +2 more sources
Pediatrics, 1989
I would like to commend the Committee on Medical Liability of the American Academy of Pediatrics (Pediatrics. 1989;83:312-313) for the development of sensible guidelines for expert medical testimony. In addition to these recommendations, I would suggest that expert witnesses obtain an affidavit from the plaintiff's attorney stating under oath that they
openaire +2 more sources
I would like to commend the Committee on Medical Liability of the American Academy of Pediatrics (Pediatrics. 1989;83:312-313) for the development of sensible guidelines for expert medical testimony. In addition to these recommendations, I would suggest that expert witnesses obtain an affidavit from the plaintiff's attorney stating under oath that they
openaire +2 more sources