Results 21 to 30 of about 206,609 (179)
The Authority of the Fallacies Approach to Argument Evaluation
Popular textbook treatments of the fallacies approach to argument evaluation employ the Adversary Method identified by Janice Moulton (1983) that takes the goal of argumentation to be the defeat of other arguments and that narrows the terms of discourse ...
Catherine Hundleby
doaj +1 more source
This paper argues for the importance of the distinction between internal and external negation over expressions for belief. The common fallacy is to confuse statement like (1) and (2): (1) John believes that the school is not closed on Tuesday; (2) John ...
Jonathan E. Adler, J. Anthony Blair
doaj +1 more source
Reasoning under uncertainty: the role of two informal fallacies in an emerging scientific inquiry [PDF]
It is now commonplace in fallacy inquiry for many of the traditional informal fallacies to be viewed as reasonable or non-fallacious modes of argument.
Cummings, L
core +1 more source
Un lieu pour les figures dans la théorie de l’argumentation
This paper deals with the treatment of figures of speech in Perelman’s and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s Treatise on Argumentation (TA), and, more broadly, with the place of figures in argumentation theory.
Christian Plantin
doaj +1 more source
Contractualism and the Conditional Fallacy [PDF]
Most contractualist ethical theories have a subjunctivist structure. This means that they attempt to make sense of right and wrong in terms of a set of principles which would be accepted in some idealized, non-actual circumstances. This makes these views
Suikkanen, Jussi
core +1 more source
The theory of action versus state orientation suggests that state-oriented people are more susceptible to sunk cost fallacy than action-oriented people because they ruminate about past costs and are reluctant to change their course of actions.
Miroslava Galasová, Matúš Grežo
doaj +1 more source
Lightening up on the Ad Hominem
In all three of its manifestations, —abusive, circumstantial and tu quoque—the role of the ad hominem is to raise a doubt about the opposite party’s casemaking bona-fides.Provided that it is both presumptive and provisional, drawing such a conclusion is ...
John Woods
doaj +1 more source
Contains fulltext : 48478.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)
Voermans, N.C. +4 more
openaire +4 more sources
Denying the Antecedent as a Legitimate Argumentative Strategy: A Dialectical Model
The standard account of denying the antecedent (DA) is that it is a deductively invalid form of argument, and that, in a conditional argument, to argue from the falsity of the antecedent to the falsity of the consequent is always fallacious.
David Godden
doaj +1 more source
A response is given to the claim by Claxton and Culyer, who stated that the policies of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) do not evaluate patients rather than treatments. The argument is made that the use of values such as quality of life and life-years is ethically dubious when used to choose which patients ought to ...
Quigley, Muireann, Harris, John
openaire +3 more sources

